EagleEye
Senior Member
So basically we paid for those bloody stickers and now they can just get tossed in the garbage?
Last edited:
|
|
|
Considering that these mandate letters were never released until the Liberals thought they could feign openness - I can't imagine that anyone would expect them to be released.Ford government sues privacy commissioner to block release of cabinet letters
The Ford government is trying to stop the release of letters outlining the premier's expectations for each of his ministers. These letters are usually made public.www.nationalobserver.com
Doug Ford sues his own government.
Considering that these mandate letters were never released until the Liberals thought they could feign openness - I can't imagine that anyone would expect them to be released.
Imagine, people wanting transparency out of a government who claimed to be “for the people”. The horror!Considering that these mandate letters were never released until the Liberals thought they could feign openness - I can't imagine that anyone would expect them to be released.
I'd like to get a transcript of all cabinet meeting too - for transparency sake.
But I realize that some things must be done behind closed doors.
I'd like to get a transcript of all cabinet meeting too - for transparency sake.
But I realize that some things must be done behind closed doors.
If mandate letters were not intended to be confidential, why did every government in Ontario (and Canada), treat them as confidential, except 1. And not doubt those 1 governments likely created a mandate letter for public consumption, while another existed for internal purposes.First off, this argument doesn't jive with anything about mandate letters.
There ought to be nothing confidential in a mandate letter.
Lets be honest, mandate letters are not legally binding, they are essentially political documents for the record.
There's really no reason to conceal them, or at least there ought not to be.
***
As to cabinet meetings, I'd like to see a large part them in the public domain.
I think it could be handled somewhat similarly (not the same) as City Councils.
Certain items, ongoing contract talks, legal advice, etc, would be designated in camera, and off-the-public-record, at least for a period of time.
But other 'routine' business would be fully public.
Those items in the proverbial middle, could see a public agenda item; but the discussion around the table could still be private.
I see no reason not to aim high when it comes to transparency, while not being naive, and realizing that some portion of the decision making process will remain closed off from public view; at least for a time.
New sex-ed curriculum builds on previous Liberal version
Consent and sexual orientation will be taught a year earlier, but discussions about gender identity move from Grade 6 to Grade 8 after public consultations by PC government.www.thestar.com
So in the end, the PC's just expand on the Liberal's sex-ed program.
I love SoCon tears.
If mandate letters were not intended to be confidential, why did every government in Ontario (and Canada), treat them as confidential, except 1.
If mandate letters were not intended to be confidential, why did every government in Ontario (and Canada), treat them as confidential, except 1. And not doubt those 1 governments likely created a mandate letter for public consumption, while another existed for internal purposes.
Actually, one government created a government for public consumption while another existed for personal purposes. I will let you guess which one that is.
Surely, the *most transparent, apparently incorruptable government ever* (nevermind the oddly capable friends and family members that seem to have a penchant for delivering resignation letters) to have existed wouldn't have the slightest problem with a bit more actual transparency?
AoD