kcantor
Senior Member
^^ what needs more thought is not necessarily the number of councillors but the number of wards. as noted, without slates or parties there isn’t much – if any – accountability outside of one’s own ward. which means that the more wards you have and the smaller they are the less their councillor can effectively represent the city at large even if that’s only a result of spending so much on ward concerns and politics there’s not enough left to pay attention to the city at large. the previous “two councillors per ward” and six wards was an attempt to minimize that. an alternative might be to elect six councillors from six wards and to elect an additional six councillors “at large” the way we elect our mayor.
the other thing we can do (and less ward politics would help) is to eliminate “the cat bylaw” syndrome by keeping all of “the little $h!t” from having to go to council over and over and over and to set administration up so not everything they look at is a full blown project that needs to go through three committees and council before it’s approved or turned down. everything that council doesn’t have to deal with leaves councillors with more time to focus on direction and the big picture instead of the minutia.
the other thing we can do (and less ward politics would help) is to eliminate “the cat bylaw” syndrome by keeping all of “the little $h!t” from having to go to council over and over and over and to set administration up so not everything they look at is a full blown project that needs to go through three committees and council before it’s approved or turned down. everything that council doesn’t have to deal with leaves councillors with more time to focus on direction and the big picture instead of the minutia.