News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 8.5K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 39K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 4.8K     0 

Ottawa warns of dangerously exhausted train crews as Alberta ramps ...
https://www.cbc.ca/.../fatigue-transport-canada-railways-oil-shipments-lac-megantic-sa...

Dec 2, 2018 -
An internal Transport Canada document warns of the safety risks posed by exhausted crew members on trains, even as Alberta pursues a plan to ratchet up already-booming shipments of oil-by-rail.

Federal work rules in the rail industry, dating from 2002, "are not effective in preventing fatigue due to work schedules and do not adequately mitigate the risks of fatigue," says the May 2018 memo.

"… fatigue is managed by a patchwork of approaches, most of which are outside TC's [Transport Canada's] control."

The memo, obtained by CBC News under the Access to Information Act, says current regulations on mandatory work-rest periods in the rail industry fail to account for major advances in the science of fatigue over the last 15 years.
[...]
Transport Canada declined to indicate when Canadians can expect to see beefed-up regulations governing fatigue in the rail industry.

"Pending regulatory changes, the department will continue to manage fatigue and fitness for duty through its ongoing oversight activities," said spokesperson Sau Sau Liu.

"We will not hesitate to take enforcement action or any other measures to address risks between now and when regulatory changes are made."
 
Does anyone know what the speed limit is on the CP line through Toronto? Perhaps requiring oil trains to slow down when traveling through populated areas would reduce the chances of a serious accident.

EDIT- I answered my own question: 50 MPH on the North Toronto Sub.
 
Last edited:
Does anyone know what the speed limit is on the CP line through Toronto? Perhaps requiring oil trains to slow down when traveling through populated areas would reduce the chances of a serious accident.
Yes, answer here: https://www.google.ca/search?q=cana...35j1j7&client=ubuntu&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

I produced the general search parameter because so many other pertinent stories show. I'll dig later to see if that speed limit is being observed.

Special mention of this hit:
Lac-Mégantic is relocating its railway line and other cities want to follow the Quebec town’s tracks
By ALLAN WOODSQuebec Bureau TorStar
Thu., May 10, 2018
[...]
But when Prime Minister Justin Trudeau arrives Friday to announce federal funding for the $133-million rail-relocation project many outsiders will be looking on with interest.

A number of cities and towns across the country are determined to follow Lac-Mégantic’s example and lead trains away from their communities. Municipal leaders say they are compelled to act out of an existential fear that what occurred in eastern Quebec in July 2013 — when a runaway train carrying crude oil from the United States derailed and exploded, killing 47 people — might happen next in their town or any other place where residents coexist with a railway.
There are movements afoot in Regina, Saskatoon and Winnipeg and other places that feel they are flirting with disaster.
“We’re not unique. The lines are getting older, the trains are getting bigger and the risks, I think, are increasing,” Niagara Falls Mayor Jim Diodati said.
The CN track in the popular tourist town cuts across roads at 14 different places. Trains carrying dangerous chemicals can stretch for kilometres. Speed limits cause traffic bottlenecks and block the path of emergency vehicles. These problems and risks are exacerbated by the “regular” mechanical malfunctions, he said.
“There’s only one solution,” he said. “It’s to get the dangerous cargo as far away from the people as possible and stop bisecting cities for the convenience of profits, because that’s what it is.”
[...]
The mayor of White Rock, B.C., Wayne Baldwin, is learning about the costs and headaches.

The Lac-Mégantic disaster prompted the coastal suburb to re-evaluate its own rail safety situation. It led to a realization that there were now 20 passenger and freight trains a day — up from four — passing on tracks that literally hug the waterline.
The freight trains carry a variety of chemical substances in addition to coal that include chlorine, hydrochloric acid, hydrous ammonia and various types of liquid fuels.
“The same Bakken crude (oil) that blew up in Lac-Mégantic has been going through here as well,” Baldwin said. “They’re like 110-car trains so they’re not small and we’ve had issues. Because of the windy, twisty route that they follow, some of the trains have uncoupled, which is apparently not a good thing.”
Part of the train route runs through an area that is prone to landslides, which have interrupted train service on several occasions, and is particularly vulnerable during the rainy spring season.
“It’s a matter of potential loss of life, quite frankly,” he said, adding that it has been a couple of decades since there was a landslide severe enough to derail a train.
“If it were a coal train that wouldn’t be good environmentally, but it wouldn’t cause any loss of life. But if it were a train carrying Bakken crude or chlorine or hydrous ammonia it would be huge.”
White Rock and neighbouring Surrey have inquired about relocating the rails, which are owned and operated by Texas-based BNSF Railway. Baldwin said the changes would result in a shorter, quicker route for passing trains, but they must first make their case in an economic feasibility study that would cost an estimated $900,000.
The Manitoba government had considered relocating rail lines that cut through Winnipeg, creating a literal and figurative divide in the city. The project was shut down in 2016 after a change of government.
In Saskatoon, where the government wants to relocate CP tracks to deal with the city’s traffic woes, the estimated cost is $589.7-million, according to the Saskatoon Star-Phoenix.
But Judy Harwood, a local reeve in a nearby town where residents would be impacted by the relocation told the paper a CP rail official told her that “CP has no designs on doing anything.” CP declined to comment to the paper.
In Niagara Falls, Mayor Diodati said the conversation with CN officials has been cordial so far. He said company officials have confided: “We don’t want to be in the city any more than you don’t want us in the city.”
“They said, ‘show us a business plan that we can entertain’ since we are the ones pushing for this,” Diodati said.
So that is what Niagara Falls is doing. The city has hired consultants and advisers with experience in the rail industry to help them build the case to get the tracks out of town.
Eventually, though, the rail companies must respond.
“I think all the mayors and all the politicians from coast to coast, if they all rise up and share their concerns I don’t think they’ll have any choice but to deal with it, especially if it’s going to threaten the revenues and the bottom line of the rail company.”
Lac-Mégantic is relocating its railway line and other cities want to ..
 
Last edited:
I think Venezuela's problem was more on their reliance on socialism and not on oil.
That is true, save that the 'socialism' aspect is in name only. It's an autocracy...just like...ummm...Arabia. There's still a massive market for their crude (which Alberta bitumen should be able to compete with, but still can't price and excuse wise) but the sanctions and 'collection agencies' are plundering it. Not a reputable source of news, but:
Venezuelan Oil Crisis Could Lead To Pirates In The Caribbean
By ZeroHedge - Jan 31, 2019, 3:00 PM CST

In all due respect to this forum's surmise, however, the prime emphasis is on "Railway Safety in the GTA".

There's only one way to reduce the threat for all freight wagons, and that's to bypass the densest part of the City. We know how to do that, and a half (Freight Bypass) and whole (Missing Link) ones have been proposed and discussed at length. The vast majority of the GTHA support some form of it. Only some in York Region are against it. Oddly, not a squeak from them on pipelines running through their neighbourhoods or multi-lane highways, also carrying dangerous cargo. Or GO trains and electric xmssn lines. Go figure.
 
And another thing, isn't the Oil market going to collapse in about 20 years as Electric cars get more and more prevalent?

I don't think it would be wise to be making large infrastructure investments to support this industry. We need to move on.

I realize this mentality isn't a vote getter for Politicians though.


The pipelines wont get built as they are not gender neutral.
 
It's clear that the railway industry believes that a change to brake technology is just too daunting, even in unit train service, because of the extent to which unit trains are broken up and intermingled with other types of railcars - at terminals, on switching moves and to/from branches etc. I still wonder whether hard-coupling 6-packs of cars to reduce air leakage might be a small step forward.

So I may be jumping the gun a bit. Nevertheless, the number of derailments is rising. The number of derailments in the GTA in the next ten years will not be zero.
From today's Globe, and one has to think "SNC Lavalin on Rails":

Subscription only copy, so will post only what's directly relevant to this string by Fair Use terms:
CP Rail pushes back against handbrake rule imposed after derailment
ERIC ATKINSTRANSPORTATION REPORTER
PUBLISHED MARCH 1, 2019UPDATED 2 HOURS AGO
FOR SUBSCRIBERS

Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd. is pushing back on the transport minister’s order regarding the use of rail-car handbrakes, seeking changes to a new rule enacted after the fatal train wreck near Field, B.C., on Feb. 4.
Transport Minister Marc Garneau issued the order four days after a 112-car CP grain train sped out of control down a track in the Rocky Mountains and derailed, killing the three crew members.
The new rule requires that operators of trains halted in an emergency stop on a mountain grade apply a “sufficient” number of handbrakes to prevent the train from rolling away.
An investigator with the Transportation Safety Board (TSB) said there were no handbrakes applied on the train, which had made an emergency stop near the B.C.-Alberta border after its crew had trouble controlling its speed.
Calgary-based CP presented alternative measures to the time-consuming task of manually setting handbrakes in a rail industry meeting convened by Transport Canada last week, according to an industry source familiar with the meeting, but did not convince regulators the minister’s directive should be replaced.

Separately, on Monday, another CP crew was forced to hit the emergency brakes after losing control of a 109-car grain train on the same stretch of westbound tracks, coming to a halt without derailing near the town of Field, The Globe and Mail has learned.
CP’s train had no handbrakes applied when it moved; the minister’s order would require a similar train to use handbrakes on about 98 rail cars.
“The ministerial order will stay in place at least until the TSB’s investigation is complete and we get all the answers needed to inform next steps,” said Delphine Denis, spokeswoman for Mr. Garneau. [...]

I defer comment at this time, the situation is becoming so abstract...
 

Back
Top