News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.5K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.3K     0 

Today:

IMG_9853.JPG


IMG_9855.JPG


IMG_9856.JPG


IMG_9858.JPG


IMG_9860.JPG
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9853.JPG
    IMG_9853.JPG
    136.7 KB · Views: 672
  • IMG_9855.JPG
    IMG_9855.JPG
    124.3 KB · Views: 685
  • IMG_9856.JPG
    IMG_9856.JPG
    132.4 KB · Views: 696
  • IMG_9858.JPG
    IMG_9858.JPG
    165.3 KB · Views: 668
  • IMG_9860.JPG
    IMG_9860.JPG
    311 KB · Views: 690
^^ Care to explain your point?
I mean, to me it's looks just fine, for what I see from those photo the overall quality material seems ok, I like the warmth of the bricks, less the beige precast, and the black sprandel doesn't look bad compared to any other average condo we have see in these years. Granted, it's not an architectural masterpiece, and the whole project isn't really much "urban" but hey, this is Markham so I think it'll be fine once better retails will be established. I think we should stop scream "awfull" to every average condo project like this one just because they are not minimalist all-balcony-glossy-boxes from some big architectural firm.
 
Last edited:
I agree it's really not "terrible" ... I find, and more so lately ... here on UT we seem so quick to throw out the "TERRIBLE" word, if it's not great, it must "suck" ...

Anyway I don't mind this, what I don't like is how all the buildings in the complex essentailly looks the same, sometimes this can work but not here I find, I'd much rather it have been more of a mix.

Also, maybe someone can answer, the Hi-way 7 frontage is terrible (uh oh, did I just use such a word ... but I ment it ; ) I think there are plans to do streetscaping here but the fronting of the condos themselves is reallt bad, why not retail directly on to 7 ??
 

Back
Top