TKTKTK
Senior Member
Well, you have made yourself clear: you are not in favour of redeveloping the waterfront either. At least you are direct about it.
For those who are interested in making this area something other than underused industrial land, and turning it into a 'prime location', getting rid of the Gardiner is key.
I have nothing against redeveloping the waterfront, so please don't try and put words into my mouth. I don't see a conflict of interest between the two ideas. I think you're being duplicitous in suggesting that the only way to develop the waterfront is to first tear down the Gardiner. The ideas are very separate.
i think there's also a difference in turning the area into a "prime location" and just developing the area. The Gardiner doesn't stand in the way of development.