Edward
Senior Member
It certainly does better connecting to the DVP.
|
|
|
Look how beautiful the street looks here. You can't ruin it now just to connect St Clair. I once googled St Clair to see why it was not connected past Mt Pleasant and that's when I saw all the residential houses.
I've often wondered about that: are the houses there because the parts of St Clair don't connect, or do the two parts exist because the gap was filled with housing?
Why exactly are there two stretches of St Clair that are separate? Was there ever anything to connect them, like a trail through the valley?
A direct connection between the two St Clairs would require a really long bridge over the valley, which is never gonna happen because it's simply not feasible or worth it.
I have fantasies that one day in the far future, it would be worthwhile having another east-west transit line, and we can extend the St. Clair streetar line in a tunnel from Mount Pleasant to the DRL station near O'Connor/Pape.A direct connection between the two St Clairs would require a really long bridge over the valley, which is never gonna happen because it's simply not feasible or worth it.
It was done on many roads. Look at Leslie. Chunk a Queen. Chunk at Danforth (late renamed Donlands). Chunk south of Eglinton. Chunk in the north.Okay, but what was the point of giving the same name to two long roads with a huge gap between them?
I have fantasies that one day in the far future, it would be worthwhile having another east-west transit line, and we can extend the St. Clair streetar line in a tunnel from Mount Pleasant to the DRL station near O'Connor/Pape.
It was done on many roads. Look at Leslie. Chunk a Queen. Chunk at Danforth (late renamed Donlands). Chunk south of Eglinton. Chunk in the north.
Ditto for one major line east as well. Woodbine.
Even now, look at Rathburn in Mississauga. Or many other roads in the region.
Okay, but what was the point of giving the same name to two long roads with a huge gap between them?
And yet we ended up with a mess of local roads that don't connect due to landowners subdividing willy nilly. Quite strange. They obviously never planned for a metropolis here.
Leslie was always the road allowance between Concession II and Concession III east of Yonge Street. Looking at the 1880s mapping, it was only opened north of Lawrence, from Danforth to the Don (now Donlands) and the CN Tracks to the lake (Leslie). See http://digital.library.mcgill.ca/CountyAtlas/showtownship2.php?townshipid=York+North http://digital.library.mcgill.ca/CountyAtlas/showtownship2.php?townshipid=York+South+East and "1976 Land Grant" mapping at http://oldtorontomaps.blogspot.ca/2014/06/contemporary-maps-with-historical.htmlThat little chunk of Leslie way up in Leaside that nfitz mentioned has to be the weirdest example of a discontinuous section. I can't imagine that was ever really intended to be connected to the rest, and it probably got its name just from being on the alignment of the original concession.
Cliff Road and Britannia Road are another two examples in Mississauga.Queensway in Mississauga is another, but the western part got renamed Lincoln Green Way and Sheridan Park Dr.
Cliff Road and Britannia Road are another two examples in Mississauga.
Relative to the size of the city, I think Mississauga takes the cake when it comes to missing links in the road network. No thanks to the airport, the 403/410-401 interchange and of course, the area of Mississauga Road south of Dundas.