afransen
Senior Member
Honestly, it's probably not that.
|
|
|
ya, thats how life works
The ironic part about that comic is that Quebec is no better at this than we are. The amount of highways Montreal has makes Toronto look like an urbanist's wet dream, and Quebec is spending even more money on massive overbuilt highways (3e lien)ya, thats how life works
That's... unusual. I think the only places where this is true is within major cities like Toronto and Ottawa. (and only the ETR). Everywhere else you have destination labels. I assume this is because in these areas the highways are mostly used for Intracity purposes, and as such the final destination isn't that useful.Does anyone know why the highway signage standards in Ontario are relatively poor? This is a bit of a pet peeve of mine and apologies if it's been discussed already.
For example, highway signs will often not refer to destinations. They might say "401 West" without making reference to London, Windsor etc.
Another example is the use of exit numbers, which are sometimes non-existant even on 400-series highways.
DVP is run by the City of Toronto, so the signage rules and theirs and theirs alone.Don't get me started on highways like the DVP...
exactly. At 401/402 junction no mention of Port Huron or DetroitDoes anyone know why the highway signage standards in Ontario are relatively poor? This is a bit of a pet peeve of mine and apologies if it's been discussed already.
For example, highway signs will often not refer to destinations. They might say "401 West" without making reference to London, Windsor etc.
Another example is the use of exit numbers, which are sometimes non-existant even on 400-series highways.
Don't get me started on highways like the DVP...
I was amused to see a sign in Montreal that said 'Toronto' with an arrow. I imagine a poor tourist thinking you could just pop over to Toronto. My European family often has this misconception that you can day trip to Ottawa or Montreal.That's... unusual. I think the only places where this is true is within major cities like Toronto and Ottawa. (and only the ETR). Everywhere else you have destination labels. I assume this is because in these areas the highways are mostly used for Intracity purposes, and as such the final destination isn't that useful.
Why would the 401/402 junction need to reference Port Huron or Detroit from that distance? Sarnia and Windsor are both significant enough geographically as control cities.exactly. At 401/402 junction no mention of Port Huron or Detroit
On Highway 401 & 427 area there is only an airplane logo in some of the signs, no "Pearson Airport"
Why would the 401/402 junction need to reference Port Huron or Detroit from that distance? Sarnia and Windsor are both significant enough geographically as control cities.
I'm guessing the standard from that distance out is to sign for the Canadian control or terminal city. Otherwise, how far do you push it? Hwy 401 is also the route that takes you to Florida.exactly. At 401/402 junction no mention of Port Huron or Detroit
On Highway 401 & 427 area there is only an airplane logo in some of the signs, no "Pearson Airport"