crs1026
Superstar
^Thanks for finding that. I guess the answer is, no, they didnt pursue a six-pointed concept very seriously.
The geometry of the turns might be difficult. Also, the intersection sits on quite a slope. And as you can see from the effort put into analysing whether simpler overpasses and underpasses would work, the throughput of the junction as a whole has to be respected. The cloverleaf of the past few decades, while toxic to liveability, is very good at moving traffic. The solution is a new balance, but it can't throw throughput out the window.
Elevated or underground pedestrian passageways? Like one sees just about everywhere in Europe? Shhhh.... don't mention that so close to Eglinton Avenue. You will be told that they make pedestrian crossings just about impossible.
- Paul
The geometry of the turns might be difficult. Also, the intersection sits on quite a slope. And as you can see from the effort put into analysing whether simpler overpasses and underpasses would work, the throughput of the junction as a whole has to be respected. The cloverleaf of the past few decades, while toxic to liveability, is very good at moving traffic. The solution is a new balance, but it can't throw throughput out the window.
Elevated or underground pedestrian passageways? Like one sees just about everywhere in Europe? Shhhh.... don't mention that so close to Eglinton Avenue. You will be told that they make pedestrian crossings just about impossible.
- Paul