the lemur
Senior Member
Now The Star's Mallick is staunchly defending the chair purchase. Quite honestly she just sounds clueless in her article.
On the flip side, I don't understand the complaints about a Pan Am dude claiming a $2 coffee as an expense. Yeah I understand there are other issues and he comes across as cheap but it is a legitimate expense and a more than reasonable cost. I would understand more the outrage if it was a $40 martini or $100 in a strip bar, but no, reporters are focusing on a $2 coffee and $1 parking.
My understanding is that buying reasonable facsimiles of the original chairs is cheaper than having them restored, and works out to a few pennies per taxpayer. I'm not sure if that's Mallick's argument as well, but I gave up trying to read her proudly irrational columns a long time ago.
I don't get why there are complaints about the Pan Am expenses either. There is a cost associated with preparing for these games (the organizers may want to pay their own way for really small expenses, though) and it was Ford himself who returned from Guadalajara claiming that TO2015 would bring in thousands and thousands of jobs and hundreds of millions in revenue, so what's a few thousand in upfront organizational expenses?