guitarchitect
Active Member
One symptom of cocaine abuse is an inflated sense of self-worth.
|
|
|
One symptom of cocaine abuse is an inflated sense of self-worth.
Behold, Warmington's latest, and the Ford defense strategy should the TPS follow through. Despite the false equivalences, he does kind of have a point. Should not OPP be involved here?
http://www.torontosun.com/2013/10/0...gating-rob-ford-they-shouldnt-be-from-toronto
The plant thing was a boondongle but that is the fault of the residents of Oakville
yeah, I said it.
it's like rob ford thinks he's st. john bosco himself...
I wonder if they are connected to Project Traveler too, and along with it, illegal gun sales?This is what I think is going on:
Doug is running a drug trafficking empire (it would explain his financial situation much better than any dividends from Deco would), and Rob is an addict. Rob's stupidity and the dumb ass company he keeps has now shone a light on Doug's activities. Doug will throw Rob under the bus before this is done because he will be facing some serious charges. I'm guessing drug trafficking, racketeering, probably some bribery and intimidation charges. Rob is culpable in this, but this is Doug's baby.
I'm not sure whats supposed to be so problematic about this latest controversy.
There's nothing at the current moment to suggest Ford did anything to circumvent the background checks.
If something does come up to suggest that, then that would be a controversy. For all we know (and for what the article suggests), "Peter Payman" was the one who deliberately circumvented the necessary background checks. If Ford simply brought him in, then he did nothing wrong. It was up to the school board to decide whether to hire this man given his criminal record.
I'm not sure whats supposed to be so problematic about this latest controversy.
There's nothing at the current moment to suggest Ford did anything to circumvent the background checks.
If something does come up to suggest that, then that would be a controversy. For all we know (and for what the article suggests), "Peter Payman" was the one who deliberately circumvented the necessary background checks. If Ford simply brought him in, then he did nothing wrong.
Aye aye aye. The fake name means that they didn't make the decision. They couldn't without the correct background information.It was up to the school board to decide whether to hire this man given his criminal record.
I'm not sure whats supposed to be so problematic about this latest controversy.
There's nothing at the current moment to suggest Ford did anything to circumvent the background checks.
If something does come up to suggest that, then that would be a controversy. For all we know (and for what the article suggests), "Peter Payman" was the one who deliberately circumvented the necessary background checks. If Ford simply brought him in, then he did nothing wrong. It was up to the school board to decide whether to hire this man given his criminal record.
If something does come up to suggest that, then that would be a controversy. For all we know (and for what the article suggests), "Peter Payman" was the one who deliberately circumvented the necessary background checks. If Ford simply brought him in, then he did nothing wrong. It was up to the school board to decide whether to hire this man given his criminal record.
Read this on Toronto Reddit. Wouldn't that be an incredible angle.
Perhaps he had kiddie porn on his phone? Would explain why he went to Lisi to get it back rather than the police.
That's a ridiculous accusation. No indication of that whatsoever.