This may just be a case of semantics and me just wishing for stuff to slip out via verbal slip-ups but one thing I heard that jumped out at me in the 'little monkey/country pumpkin' interview was what she said when asked about the smuggling in of stuff to GS.
Typically, to catch a liar it's the little things that slip people up, the slight inferences or whatever...so, when I heard her denial in the interview, but she trailed off her answer and added "...while I was there" it was like a bit of am a-ha lightbulb going off: she's telling the truth - in that she didn't smuggle anything in
while she was there - but after she had been kicked out and driving the Escalade that appeared late at nite in a known area for smuggling in of stuff........she was no longer a 'resident' and 'was (no longer) there'. Make sense?
Compare the written quote “I didn’t smuggle anything into GreeneStone to give to anyone,” she claimed. “There may be other people that had that issue but as far as Rob and I were concerned, there was nothing like that going on.” to the quote on video where she adds off, trailing
"...while I was there." (Skip forward to about the 3:30 - 3:50 mark in the interview here:
http://www.torontosun.com/2014/07/10/mayor-rob-fords-rehab-buddy-speaks-out
Good liars say as little as possible...bad liars invariably slip up by saying too much.
Might be wishful thinking but, well, sometimes that all we've got eh??