Fantomex
New Member
I don't think opponents of Ford actually understand what lead to his victory and why he will likely be re-elected. He was a quotable fool, easily assailable as a buffoon, lacking the polished gleam of a Smitherman type before the last election campaign, yet was elected by a large margin. His numbers are still pretty high, he is the incumbent, and frankly, his base doesn't see him as having gotten off on a technicality... they see this as a vindication. Trying to oust him by all methods possible is only seen as persecution. Keep making him a Martyr and you almost guarantee his re-election.
His success is not based on his appeal to progressives and liberals, so attacking him for lacking those qualities isn't going to dent him. A fool you can relate to is always better than being talked down to by one you can't.
The longer this fool is going to be in office, the more Toronto's goose is cooked as a (self-proclaimed) world class city. People across the planet are going to be asking why a recall election can't be called, or for impeachment hearings to be started as in other parts of the planet (and in the United States.) Even if Ford really can't do anything as mayor anymore, this will still have an effect on Toronto and how Toronto's perceived as a city for quite a while (ask Christopher Hume how that is, and he'll tell you what it is while extolling the virtues of other cities in Scandinavia.) Any way you want to slice it, this is a setback for democracy, and for Toronto.
As for what one person said before about a test for mayoral candidates, that test should really be applied to voters, instead, with one portion (the most important part) dealing with civics.