News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.3K     0 

This is one example that's bothered me for a while. SE corner of Bayview and Eglinton. Two newish poles (within the past couple of years) placed so close together that they had to jury-rig a way to make the pedestrian audible button accessible!

Edit: I believe the pole on the left is more recent than the one on the right. Why they couldn't have used one pole (weight/loads?) I have no clue

One reason we have so many poles like this is that the City and utilities HATE sharing 'their poles'. the metal one with the button is a City traffic light pole, the concrete is probably Hydro.

I agree with @DSCToronto 's assessment above, but asked someone why this is such an issue....

They placed the blame squarely on Hydro, who they said (paraphrase) make it difficult and costly for the City to attach infra to their poles.

I'm not sure what the reasoning is........... I'm working on digging into to it a bit more if I can find the time.

But seeing as the City is Hydro's sole shareholder and can issue shareholder direction................. we must do better.
 
I agree with @DSCToronto 's assessment above, but asked someone why this is such an issue....

They placed the blame squarely on Hydro, who they said (paraphrase) make it difficult and costly for the City to attach infra to their poles.

I'm not sure what the reasoning is........... I'm working on digging into to it a bit more if I can find the time.

But seeing as the City is Hydro's sole shareholder and can issue shareholder direction................. we must do better.

And there are LOTS of examples of two CITY poles side by side. TTC and traffic lights and No Parking signage. I have no doubt Hydro are a pain to deal with but it's NOT only them.-
 
Last edited:
They placed the blame squarely on Hydro, who they said (paraphrase) make it difficult and costly for the City to attach infra to their poles.
...
But seeing as the City is Hydro's sole shareholder and can issue shareholder direction................. we must do better.
This is the question! The City owns Hydro so why?
 
And there are LOTS of examples of two CITY poles side by side. TTC and traffic lights and No Parking signage. I have no doubt Hydro are a pain to deal with but it's NOT only them.-
1741800664552.png


I see nothing wrong here 😆
 
This is the question! The City owns Hydro so why?
Because the City does not control the day to day activities of Toronto Hydro, which has an independent Board and (to be fair) SOME of it activities are controlled by its regulator.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PL1
A report to next week's Executive ctte, in theory, seeks to advance the idea of a 'Clean and Beautiful City'.

In reality its a report that recommends more reports, and substitutes process for accomplishment.


The recommendations are thus:

1744034160825.png


Develop process, review process, review current practice and review and 'enhance' (in a non-specific way)'.....is not action.

This is not that hard.

Clean:

- More garbage cans, emptied more often
- More street cleaning
- More clean-ups of ravines/orphan sites from litter/illegal/dumping etc.; and then investing in mitigating recurrence through strategic use of fencing, making a space appear cared for, and enforcement.

Beautiful:

- A requirement for beautification of median traffic islands whenever they come up for reconstruction.
- Expanding existing flower planting at existing beds, by mandating 3-seasons of flowers (spring, summer, fall)
- Expanding the number of flower beds in parks and public spaces by 25%
- Investing in attractive Gateways to Toronto
- Funding existing public realm projects and pushing them forward, notably John Street, Yonge-downtown, and Yonge North York.
- Mandated aggressive, systematic removal of slip lanes, and the creation of beautified public spaces with seating to replace them, whereever feasible.

- Finally, a City Landscape Architect, widely respected, to set down specifics choices for standard infrastructure from parks waste receptacles to street lights and then those standards, once adopted by Council become mandatory.
 
Last edited:
Sometimes, it's the littlest things we can't see to get right. The climate has warmed, and we go vast stretches in November through April without snow.

But the city uses the winter as an excuse not to clean streets of litter (save perhaps for a few touristy areas) or to enforce bylaws requiring private property owners to remove litter in a timely manner. By March and April, everything looks disgusting in commercial areas. The wind also carries the litter into residential areas, parks, and ravines.

Look, if there's snow, cancel the litter removal. But don't go half a year without litter maintenance in our public and publicly accessible private spaces and expect a clean and beautiful city.
 
Sometimes, it's the littlest things we can't see to get right. The climate has warmed, and we go vast stretches in November through April without snow.

But the city uses the winter as an excuse not to clean streets of litter (save perhaps for a few touristy areas) or to enforce bylaws requiring private property owners to remove litter in a timely manner. By March and April, everything looks disgusting in commercial areas. The wind also carries the litter into residential areas, parks, and ravines.

Look, if there's snow, cancel the litter removal. But don't go half a year without litter maintenance in our public and publicly accessible private spaces and expect a clean and beautiful city.

If you have a close look at who at the City authored the report.............you'll notice something conspicuous.......

Not one name from Waste Management.

That's right.....a report that should have included mention of street cleaning and litter etc............ no one thought to include the people who actually do that work on the report.
 
I'm actually surprised the medians aren't in worse shape considering how long people have been squatting there in tents. They're not that bad. It's just that the whole street needs a rethink. Those medians have never attracted many people to enjoy them.
 
I'm actually surprised the medians aren't in worse shape considering how long people have been squatting there in tents. They're not that bad. It's just that the whole street needs a rethink. Those medians have never attracted many people to enjoy them.

I understand that some of the physical elements are falling apart and there is a lead time for repairing those (though do recall the case of the fountain - and how long it took to get it not working again), but in this case it's a failure of maintenance.

These sites are perfect candidates for guerrilla gardening.

AoD
 
I understand that some of the physical elements are falling apart and there is a lead time for repairing those (though do recall the case of the fountain - and how long it took to get it not working again), but in this case it's a failure of maintenance.

These sites are perfect candidates for guerrilla gardening.

AoD

University Avenue's Islands have always been a signature point of pride for horticulture.

Last year was the first year that I recall them not being planted at all, and allowed to infill with weeds.

I don't remember any pubic discussion of a policy change or budget adjustment related to this.

I assumed at the time (last year) that this was done because of the construction work that was scheduled; though I'm not at all convinced (assuming that's accurate) that this was necessary.

But that it has now dragged on again..........has me wondering if Parks quietly cut the money for this.....and didn't tell anyone.
 
University Avenue's Islands have always been a signature point of pride for horticulture.

Last year was the first year that I recall them not being planted at all, and allowed to infill with weeds.

I don't remember any pubic discussion of a policy change or budget adjustment related to this.

I assumed at the time (last year) that this was done because of the construction work that was scheduled; though I'm not at all convinced (assuming that's accurate) that this was necessary.

But that it has now dragged on again..........has me wondering if Parks quietly cut the money for this.....and didn't tell anyone.

Unless I am mistaken though, they seem to have the time/energy/budget for those "art" pieces that are stuck in some of the planters?

AoD
 

Back
Top