NIV
New Member
The connection to Sheppard west station will either require a loop to connect with line 1 or it could continue west and merge with the track going to Downsview
|
|
|
- Thread starter denfromoakvillemilton
- Start date
nfitz
Superstar
Why would it merge at all? Instead of just continuing into the yard?
Rainforest
Senior Member
That's true. The Sheppard subway's connection to Lakeshore is certainly not the top priority, there are many projects in other parts of the city that should be done before that.
Perhaps in a distant future .. thinking of that project as a new GO line (in the 401 corridor, and a lot cheaper per km than a subway), that just happens to run subway trains, and those trains continue into the subway tunnel once they reach the dense area.
kEiThZ
Superstar
Mostly agree. I wouldn't want the possibility ruled out. That's why I prefer Option 2A.
CapitalSeven
Senior Member
I'm intrigued by option 2B, the one that jogs down to STC.
While the routing is just a general idea, it seems to run north-south along Midland, which is mostly lined with industrial buildings, and there's an empty strip on the west side almost continually, from 10 to 25 meters wide.
Running a curve to the SRT alignment is not that challenging.
Would they build an entirely new elevated ROW, or could some or all of the SRT be reused? I think we were told in the course of earlier schemes it couldn't support subway trains, but could additional bents resolve that? The guideway, at 10 metres, is actually about the same width as the elevated subway structures on line 2. Do they envision using the full-size subway vehicles on this line, or converting to something smaller and more nimble?
A Brimley-Triton station would be well situated for development; there was talk at one time of adding an SRT stop right there. LRT or BRT on Sheppard could continue through to Kennedy-Agincourt ensuring connections to both subway lines and GO.
The whole shot between Kennedy and STC is relatively easy to build elevated and a comprehensive set of connections among subway, surface, and GO would be created. Not saying this is the best or most likely option, but there is some logic to it.
While the routing is just a general idea, it seems to run north-south along Midland, which is mostly lined with industrial buildings, and there's an empty strip on the west side almost continually, from 10 to 25 meters wide.
Running a curve to the SRT alignment is not that challenging.
Would they build an entirely new elevated ROW, or could some or all of the SRT be reused? I think we were told in the course of earlier schemes it couldn't support subway trains, but could additional bents resolve that? The guideway, at 10 metres, is actually about the same width as the elevated subway structures on line 2. Do they envision using the full-size subway vehicles on this line, or converting to something smaller and more nimble?
A Brimley-Triton station would be well situated for development; there was talk at one time of adding an SRT stop right there. LRT or BRT on Sheppard could continue through to Kennedy-Agincourt ensuring connections to both subway lines and GO.
The whole shot between Kennedy and STC is relatively easy to build elevated and a comprehensive set of connections among subway, surface, and GO would be created. Not saying this is the best or most likely option, but there is some logic to it.
NIV
New Member
Most likely following the Go train corridor and then using the east west SRT right of way.
Aplus23
Active Member
If you are coming from east of McCowan, then having the Terminus at the STC defeats the whole crosstown connectivity. If you are coming from the west of Sheppard, STC might not be your final destination, therefore a one stop transfer to STC isn't all that dreadful to you.
If you are coming from the west & want to continue along Sheppard, then terminating it at McCowan, gives you the option, to continue along Sheppard hopefully with the EELRT.
2A was always my preferred choice
If you are coming from the west & want to continue along Sheppard, then terminating it at McCowan, gives you the option, to continue along Sheppard hopefully with the EELRT.
2A was always my preferred choice
micheal_can
Senior Member
I know there are projects galore to get RER going. I also know that at the drop of a writ, those projects not already started can be canceled. And those projects under construction can also be stopped. I am a firm believe in "it ain't happening until it has happened" when it comes to every government project.
The question is, for a place like the STC or MTC, or any major points in between the GO lines and stations, will GO RER be enough? For example, would GO RER be good for a student living with their parents in Pickering going to Centennial College?
Who knows if there is enough demand for it. What I want to see is that the line is not set up that a future want for an extension is not difficult. It may never bee needed in any of our lifetimes, or it may be the next major transit project. Either way, lets make sure that if it is to happen, it can happen.
I do watch the news. I guess it isn't newsworthy enough for any of the national news broadcasts. Now that I know, this makes the GO even more expensive.
ARG1
Senior Member
For the love of God, please actually learn about what's happening before commenting on them? Please
So no, it can't be cancelled at this point in time.
The contract with ONXPRESS has been signed, and the project will be built. Even in a freak show situation where Ford calls a snap election, the libs/NDP win, and they for some reason want to cancel the project, it would likely cost millions of dollars to cancel the P3 at this stage.
So no, it can't be cancelled at this point in time.
The Sheppard Subway will be useful here, but the GO bus is perfectly fine for now.
micheal_can
Senior Member
Tell that to the people who were building the Eglinton Subway in the 1990s.
Right now, absolutely.
ARG1
Senior Member
This isn't the 90s anymore. Projects today are built using P3s that are filled to the brim with Poison Pills so that things like Eglinton West can't happen.
And please tell me, who is planning to cancel GO Expansion? I don't really like the NDP, but even I'm not silly enough to suggest that they're going to bend over backwards to cancel GO Expansion at this stage.
micheal_can
Senior Member
While it may be true that it would be hard to cancel projects, they could do all the work but not fund the actual cost to have RER service times.Or has the rolling stock been ordered already? If RER was one massive project that all parts were tied to each other with those poison pills that are even connected to those future contracts, then maybe, but with how some governments have been, I would not hold my breath.
Considering this is also being funded by the federal government, we also need to ask if any federal party may reduce the funding. Have we heard anything positive or negative from Pierre Pollivre about this project or transit improvements in general?
Coolibop
Active Member
For reference, is this a problem without rail? I'm not sure how this is a problem today.
micheal_can
Senior Member
What does having a subway solve anywhere in the city?
Coolibop
Active Member
None in the example you provided.