denfromoakvillemilton
Senior Member
I'm not buying that argument.
Yes it sets an ugly precedent, but SELRT and SRT are different beasts. Subway plan isn't bad at all in place of the SRT and it doesn't cost much extra. Sheppard on the other hand has no where near the ridership demand and will cost an incredible amount of money that we don't have and if we did have, would go to the DRL. Sheppard will require the support of council and even if Ford got re-elected, no way council will go with the subway.
You know where the ugly precedent could re-appear in the future? Eglinton East and Eglinton West. If local Councillors start asking for it to be underground like in Midtown instead of "second-class in-median streetcar hogging my road", then we might see something happen. I hope Eglinton East at least is too far gone to change plans.
Neither does Bloor Danforth. This idea that the the Bloor Danforth extension is a good idea and Sheppard East is not is ridiculous. They both are and neither should be built at all. In fact one could say the point of the SELRT is to stop subway expansion.
For eglinton, they won't ask the East part to be buried, they can't tear up Kingston Road/Hwy 2 for a long imo. Eglinton West, I agree, and its the same thing which is why I'm against Bloor Danforth. The problem is Eglinton was supposed to be all on the surface.