News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.1K     0 

Yes I totally agree, the actual building is crap, but as I said the location is great. Moving it nearby (like the temporary tent) makes sense; but moving it so far away from the neighbourhood is a bit of a disservice to the area.

But you do bring up a could-have-been-a-great-idea with the library being part of Time and Space, or even Whitfield maybe.
The temporary tent LOCATION (125 The Esplanade) was a perfectly good location for a St Lawrence Library branch , the tent itself would not be a good place - it is reaching the end of its life and is starting to disintegrate. It will (supposedly) be removed 'soon'.
 
Yup, far away from population growth. The below also doesn't include the Corktown TOC.

I count 17 towers on this map and 13 of them are vapourware.

Far more actual growth is happening along the waterfront than north of Queen. There are 1500 units under construction at Quayside alone. The Queen location is a wash for West Don Lands; for other waterfront neighborhoods it's farther and much less pleasant to walk to. Meanwhile Regent Park is already getting a new library which should be large.

The biggest problem though is the specific site. This "District Library" is intended to be a community hub that can draw people for a variety of activities. That works best near parks and/or other public facilities, and near a lot of housing. That was the logic behind the previous two sites for this building, and for the existing 1970s location in St. Lawrence Neighbourhood. That is absolutely how public facilities should be planned, to coexist and support each other.

The Queen Street site has none of those qualities. There's no adjacent public space. The sidewalks are tight. Parliament is a traffic sewer and the DVP-Richmond ramp is adjacent. Queen Street here has little foot traffic.

If you're going to serve many people and create an attractive place for public gathering, this is not the spot you would choose.

This is the major library project for this part of Toronto in the next two generations and it's going in the wrong place.
 
I count 17 towers on this map and 13 of them are vapourware.

Far more actual growth is happening along the waterfront than north of Queen. There are 1500 units under construction at Quayside alone. The Queen location is a wash for West Don Lands; for other waterfront neighborhoods it's farther and much less pleasant to walk to. Meanwhile Regent Park is already getting a new library which should be large.

The biggest problem though is the specific site. This "District Library" is intended to be a community hub that can draw people for a variety of activities. That works best near parks and/or other public facilities, and near a lot of housing. That was the logic behind the previous two sites for this building, and for the existing 1970s location in St. Lawrence Neighbourhood. That is absolutely how public facilities should be planned, to coexist and support each other.

The Queen Street site has none of those qualities. There's no adjacent public space. The sidewalks are tight. Parliament is a traffic sewer and the DVP-Richmond ramp is adjacent. Queen Street here has little foot traffic.

If you're going to serve many people and create an attractive place for public gathering, this is not the spot you would choose.

This is the major library project for this part of Toronto in the next two generations and it's going in the wrong place.
You make good points but I disagree that this Library is not going to be useful. However, it was 'sold' to the TPL Board and Council, because it is going to replace the current St Lawrence Branch which will be closed. We completely agree that the new Library will NOT replace the current (small and poor) branch as it is much too far away from large parts of "St Lawrence' and when that branch is closed there will be NO TPL branches south of Queen Street between Parliament and Spadina. A large and fast growing area.
 

Back
Top