News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.5K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.3K     0 

You can tell that Markham and Vaughan Townships were laid out differently at the Town Line (Steeles) as you can easily tell the shifts in Bathurst Street and Kennedy Road, for example.

Scarborough was laid out differently as well - you can tell by the shifts in Finch and Sheppard.

The kinks in concession roads are a result of the manner in which the roads were originally surveyed 200+ years ago, not due to municipal boundaries which came later. Proper surveying practice, especially before digital equipment was introduced, was to stake out a grid box by box, rather than just going off for miles at a time in straight lines. This procedure ensures that concessions are not only straight, but parallel, because the surveying procedure includes the measurement of precise angles. This is also why the concession grid appears to consist of individual stacks of boxes, rather than a perfect checkerboard.

Now for some Toronto concession trivia: the standard surveying unit 200 years ago was called the chain. A standard acre is defined by a rectangle measuring 1 by 10 chains in size. Say you laid 100 such rectangles side by side, and stacked 10 of these strips on top of each other. You would now have a box measuring 100 by 100 chains, and containing exactly 1000 acres. This is the logic behind Toronto's concessions - they are exactly 100 chains apart, and enclose exactly 1000 acres.

1 chain measures 66 feet in length, therefore 100 chains measure 6600 feet. Convert to metric, and our concessions are 1980 metres apart, which conveniently equals about 2 km. This concession style is repeated in many rural areas throughout Ontario, including downtown Toronto, North York, most of York Region, Oakville, Burlington, and much of Ottawa. Scarborough, Etobicoke, and Peel use a different system.
 
The kinks in concession roads are a result of the manner in which the roads were originally surveyed 200+ years ago, not due to municipal boundaries which came later. Proper surveying practice, especially before digital equipment was introduced, was to stake out a grid box by box, rather than just going off for miles at a time in straight lines. This procedure ensures that concessions are not only straight, but parallel, because the surveying procedure includes the measurement of precise angles. This is also why the concession grid appears to consist of individual stacks of boxes, rather than a perfect checkerboard.

Now for some Toronto concession trivia: the standard surveying unit 200 years ago was called the chain. A standard acre is defined by a rectangle measuring 1 by 10 chains in size. Say you laid 100 such rectangles side by side, and stacked 10 of these strips on top of each other. You would now have a box measuring 100 by 100 chains, and containing exactly 1000 acres. This is the logic behind Toronto's concessions - they are exactly 100 chains apart, and enclose exactly 1000 acres.

1 chain measures 66 feet in length, therefore 100 chains measure 6600 feet. Convert to metric, and our concessions are 1980 metres apart, which conveniently equals about 2 km. This concession style is repeated in many rural areas throughout Ontario, including downtown Toronto, North York, most of York Region, Oakville, Burlington, and much of Ottawa. Scarborough, Etobicoke, and Peel use a different system.

What do Scarborough, Etobicoke and Peel use? What's the distance between our concessions?
 
The public consult is rolling forward. I guess we'll see if the region does anything about the fact no one loves their plan...
http://www.yorkregion.com/News/Vaughan/article/101909

January 21, 2010 08:08 AM
David Fleischer

If the region is determined to rename Hwy. 7, they should try to come up with something snazzier than Avenue 7.

That seemed to be the consensus from residents who weighed in online and a public meeting in Richmond Hill last night.

Names suggested by attendees ranged from the royal (Prince William or Dominion Boulevard) and metaphorical (Union Street) to the adventurous (Electric Avenue, after the nearby hydro corridor).

But the meeting's facilitator and consultant Jim Faught reminded people the renaming it a serious process.

"This will be a legacy name that could be around for 500 years," he said.

The region's position is that the road isn't really a highway anymore and as intensified neighbourhoods grow in Vaughan, Richmond Hill and Markham, it needs a new name to reflect that.

Some of the transformation that's going to occur in the next 20 or 30 years is already beginning to happen, regional director of infrastructure planning Loy Cheah said.

"The vision for Hwy. 7 is going to be very different. The three centres will become downtown nodes and become anchors of what will transform Hwy. 7," Mr. Cheah said.

As far off as that level of urbanization may seem, construction in Markham Centre is underway and within five years Viva rapid transit and the TTC subway will intersect at Jane Street.

"It's a very nice vision," said Vaughan resident Maxine Povering, adding she came into the meeting prepared to reject the renaming idea as unnecessary.

However, her vote would be for Boulevard 7.

"It has to be a significant name that will put all three communities on the map ... the name is everything," she said.

Other attendees at Tuesday's meeting suggested names commemorating important personalities.

Another consistent theme was how odd it would be to have Avenue 7 running between 14th Avenue and 16th Avenue in Markham.

"It just seems to be out of joint," said Richmond Hill Ward 6 Councillor Godwin Chan who attended along with Regional Councillor Vito Spatafora.

Hwy. 7 runs from Sarnia to Ottawa but many sections, including the 42 kilometres in York Region, were downloaded to municipalities in the 1990s.

The York Region stretch was primarily created along the 15th Concession but no one went as far as suggesting a change to the more historically correct 15th Avenue.

A segment in Markham was once known as Wellington Street but a similarly named road in Aurora makes a revival of that name unlikely.

Richmond Hill resident Anthony De Fazio wondered why so much effort was put into something with no apparent value.

"It seems totally unnecessary. It's a total waste of time and money," he said.

Everyone knows where and what Hwy. 7 is and a nice, new name won't change its character, he said.

A cost-benefit analysis showing what kind of development will be attracted by the new name would be helpful, Mr. Chan suggested.

The cost for the change is not yet known, but many of the new road signs would be replaced anyway as Viva's rapidways come online, project manager Lizuarte Simas said.

Any change would also be phased in, allowing businesses to keep old stationary until it runs out.

More than 100 people have already replied to the online surve and most comments were negative, Mr. Faught said.

All three chambers of commerce were contacted and a report that includes all comments will go to regional council before any decision is made.

Whether you hope to rock down to Electric Avenue or amble down Avenue 7, you can still reply to the region's two survey questions by following the link at www.york.ca
 
Avenue 7 or Boulevard 7, both are equally useless. They need to come up with something more creative.
 
How about Falcon Seven:

270px-Phil_Ken_Sebben.jpg
 

Back
Top