News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.3K     0 

C

cacruden

Guest
RUNGRAWEE C. PINYORAT

Associated Press

CHIANG MAI, THAILAND — A Swiss man was sentenced to 10 years in prison Thursday for spray-painting graffiti over images of Thailand's revered king, the first conviction of a foreigner in at least a decade under strict Thai laws protecting the monarchy.

Oliver Rudolf Jufer, 57, who had pleaded guilty to five counts of lèse-majesté, or insulting the monarchy, had faced a maximum sentence of 75 years in prison.

Judge Phitsanu Tanbukalee said Mr. Jufer was given a reduced sentence since he had admitted his wrongdoing.

His court-appointed lawyer, Komkrit Kunyodying, called the penalty “appropriate for the crime he has committed,†adding he did not yet know if his client planned to appeal.

The Swiss Embassy issued a tempered criticism.

“We respect the Thai justice system,†said Jacques Lauer, deputy chief of mission at the embassy in Bangkok. “However, we consider the implementation of the Thai penal code regarding lèse-majesté cases a tough one.â€

Mr. Jufer was caught by surveillance cameras on Dec. 5 spray-painting black paint over five outdoor posters of King Bhumibol Adulyadej in the northern city of Chiang Mai, where he lived, police and prosecutors said. His lawyer said he was intoxicated during the act.

King Bhumibol, the world's longest serving monarch, is greatly loved by Thais and regarded by some as semi-divine. He is protected from reproach by strict laws that forbid any criticism of the monarchy.

The vandalism coincided with King Bhumibol's 79th birthday, which was celebrated across Thailand with fireworks and prayers.

Mr. Jufer, who was shackled at the ankles and dressed in an orange prison uniform, was expressionless as the verdict was announced. He made no comment to reporters as he was ushered out of the courtroom.

His case casts a rare spotlight on Thailand's strict lèse-majesté laws, which have remained virtually unchanged since the country's first criminal code in 1908 despite the overthrow of an absolute monarchy in 1932.

Mr. Jufer's March 12 hearing was closed to the media to minimize publicity of his offence against the King, but journalists were allowed into Thursday's sentencing.

Thai television and newspapers have relied on foreign news agencies to cover the trial. The Thai media and people in general almost never make controversial comments about the King in public.

Bangkok's Criminal Court said its national database, which goes back a decade, showed that no foreigner had been convicted of lèse-majesté charges in at least 10 years. A handful of foreigners have faced similar charges in the past, but most eventually were deported to their home countries.
 
The Thai people revere and adore the King. According to many Thais I have spoken to about their love of the King, it is neither irrational nor born soley of religion, it was earned. Different Thais have different stories of actions that earned their respect (most I don't remember), but I remember being told that during the last military coup many citizens people were in the streets, many military were in the streets, and the situation was getting out of control. The King came out and said basically, you will not harm any of my people. The military returned to their barracks, the situation improved.

This act by this man was an act of total disrespect for the country (and the people) that he was a guest of. A jail term of 10 years may seem harsh, but I suspect that he will likely be freed after a short amount of time, at that time he will be told to leave and never return.

The King of Thailand actually has very little power (other than afforded him through the love and respect of the Thai people) but it is actually funny that some comments that the King has made in the past, lead many to believe that the King really does not believe that this law is a good law.... but the people of Thailand seem to have no tolerance for acts of disrespect for the King, and no-one has dared tempering this law.

Of course even if he were not charged with insulting the King, he is still guilty of vandalism, which is something I have no tolerance for.

Thailand (and it's people) are more conservative than it is given credit for, and there are some norms in most societies that you just do not violate. For Thailand, this is one of them.
 
Kinda dumb to go to another country and take up vandalism, then use intoxication as an excuse.
 
He's guilty alright...but 10 years? Wow. Karla only got 12 years here?
 
It seems ridiculous, but I suppose that freedom of expression is essentially a western value.

I think it's generally the rule that the King (who in my mind is always Yul Brenner) always issues a quick pardon after one of these sentences is imposed.
 
freedom of expression is essentially a western value

freedom of expression has limitations, in Germany - it is with references to Nazi's, on Airports it is no Bomb jokes, in Thailand - this is one.
 
ap:

Yul regret this: Brynner!

When I was an OCA student, a group of us saw him arrive at the Royal York, so we rushed over for autographs. But none of us could remember his name. And none of us had pens or paper. He threw up his hands, gave us a lovely smile ... and swept past.
 
I wonder if, had he signed your autograph book, he would have said "So let it be written! So let it be done!" all Ramases-like?

And you could have thrown yourself at his feet in your pleated, bias cut, eau-de-nil chiffon, just like Anne Baxter!
 
Years later, around 1980 when it was playing in London, I met a very charming number one son from that production, who said Brynner was very strict about keeping the temperature in the theatre at a certain precise level during rehearsals ... and always demanded star treatment.
 
A king indeed; I think it's called "staying in character" even while not actually portraying the character.

Weren't those the good old days when stars knew how to be stars? We've come a long way, from the likes of Brynner to the likes of Snoop Dogg and Britney.
 
Word. Why can't stars today make tastefully bad choices in addiction, movies and marriages, like Liz Taylor? At least she ended up with a lot of good jewels and art, and a near saintly reputation for all of her AMFAR work.
 
Weren't those the good old days when stars knew how to be stars? We've come a long way, from the likes of Brynner to the likes of Snoop Dogg and Britney.
Though Britney's lately tried her Yul Brynner gesture, we mustn't forget...
 

Back
Top