News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 8.5K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 39K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 4.8K     0 

All the money goes to Beck/driver instead of Uber taking a percentage of the fare. .

Then the driver has to pay a fixed amount to the license owner. Can be up to $200/12 hours. Uber charges 20%. So a cab driver has to earn $1000 before its better for him compared to Uber. If I was a driver I know what I would choose.

(I assume the rate has gone down but I don't know how much)

So better for the "professional" plate owner and Becks. Neutral or worse to drive for Becks for the driver.

All Becks is doing is supporting an outdated model where you needed CB radios and telephones to find a taxi driver. And the city use to need to support it by limiting supply.
 
Where Ride-Hailing and Transit Go Hand in Hand


August 3rd, 2018

By LAURA BLISS

Read More: https://www.citylab.com/transportat...e-hailing-and-transit-go-hand-in-hand/566651/

Ever planned to take the bus, but wound up calling an Uber? That’s what the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority did in 2016. That year, ridership across St. Petersburg, Florida’s fixed route bus lines plummeted by 11 percent—twice the drop PSTA experienced in the first year of the recession, and one of the deepest declines of any major U.S. system.

- Pinellas County constituents had recently rejected the concept of transit even more directly: PSTA’s one-cent “Greenlight Pinellas” sales tax proposal to spread bus service and build a light rail system bombed at the ballots in 2014. That forced the agency to eliminate some of its existing routes, and to rethink how it was doing business. So it called in the apps. To cover the areas it had left transit-bare, PSTA became the first agency in the country to subsidize Uber trips. --- Since its “Direct Connect” program launched in February 2016, PSTA has given $5 discounts on rides provided by Uber and a local taxi company (and as of more recently, Lyft) to and from 24 popular bus stops in its service area to as many as 1,000 riders per month.

- By and large, much of the North American transit industry would seem to agree. According to a report released this week by DePaul University’s Chaddick Institute for Metropolitan Development, since 2016 at least 27 more communities across the United States have joined arms with Uber, Lyft, and other transportation network companies (TNCs) to supplement or substitute traditional service—even as questions linger about the wisdom of undertaking these kinds of programs. --- Municipalities of virtually every size nationwide are dipping their toes into contracting with ride-hailing services. Washington, D.C., proposed a partnership with Uber as a transportation response to non-emergency 911 calls. Centennial, Colorado, offers free Lyft trips to light rail stations; Dublin, California, has across-the-board half-price Uber and Lyft fares.

- The most robust program in the country might be in Monrovia, California, where visitors and residents have reportedly taken more than 53,000 subsidized rides since its transit agency began offering $.50 rides on all Lyft trips within the city’s boundaries in March 2018. Others, like those in Boston and Las Vegas, are more limited, drawing on Uber and Lyft as platforms for paratransit that are easier to use for passengers and substantially cheaper for agencies to subsidize. --- In many ways, the same factors that pushed Pinellas County to the world of ride-hailing have pushed the rest of these cities: a desire to provide higher-quality mobility in areas where transit options fall short or where there’s not enough parking.

- There’s also a degree of brand-consciousness at play, said Joseph Schwieterman, the director of DePaul’s Chaddick Institute, who co-authored the report with Mallory Livingston, a DePaul graduate researcher. “Transit agencies can’t afford to become like the taxi industry and let the world pass them by," Schwieterman said. --- Working in tandem with Uber, Lyft, and other similar offerings is a way for transit agencies to insert themselves on the primary communication channel riders are already using—their smartphones—and could be a step towards reimagining the on- and off-board customer experience.

- These companies are notoriously protective of ridership data, which is a limitation for transit agencies trying to judge the success of these subsidy and tie-in programs. When PSTA signed its original contract with Uber, for example, “there was nothing in it about data,” said Bonnie Epstein, a senior planner at PSTA. --- Similarly, there’s nothing stopping Uber, Lyft, or any other private transportation company (including taxis) from raising minimum fares without notifying public agencies first. Uber has done this repeatedly in Pinellas County since the Direct Connect program launched in 2016. According to Epstein, some riders have complained that the $5 public subsidy is no longer as useful as the cost of the Uber becomes equal to (or greater than) the cost of a second bus ticket in addition to the one they’re already buying at their connecting station.

.....




Partnerships between transit agencies and ride-hailing companies have boomed since 2016. Chaddick Institute for Metropolitan Development/DePaul University

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cJtCJ-7JctKh8fsYyY3AidrETdKGx8wz/view

940.png
 
Thanks for posting.

The built form of much of north america is just not conducive to public transit. So, if we are going to continue subsidizing our public roads and auto-dependent built form, then alternative means of travel will be more worthwhile for more and more municipalities as the technology (be it the rideshare app or autonomous vehicles) develops.
 
I'm here in KUL and Singapore, and have really enjoyed using Grab. Interestingly , today I took a Grab owned car from Selangor to Petaling Jaya that the driver rents from the Grab company.

IMG_20180829_1519472.jpg
IMG_20180829_1519505.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20180829_1519472.jpg
    IMG_20180829_1519472.jpg
    82.6 KB · Views: 642
  • IMG_20180829_1519505.jpg
    IMG_20180829_1519505.jpg
    91.5 KB · Views: 638
I've used the Beck app and it does allow you to tip.

Haven't used it in a long time though - unless there's surge pricing Uber/Lyft are definitely the way to go.

Unfortunately taxi companies released apps as a response to Uber instead of innovating in the first place. The biggest problem is that different companies serve different areas - if I'm in Markham the Beck app is useless.

Who wants to install a different taxi app for each city?
 
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-uber-bringing-express-pool-service-to-toronto/

Uber bringing Express Pool service to Toronto

Uber Technologies Inc. will introduce a new carpooling tier to its ride-sharing app in Toronto on Thursday as the company continues its efforts to attract riders and wring more efficiency from drivers.

Uber Express Pool, introduced last year to U.S. cities including Los Angeles and Philadelphia, builds on the multirider, multidestination design of Uber Pool, which launched in Toronto in January, 2016. It connects riders heading in the same general direction, allowing them to share a car for a cheaper trip.

The new Uber Express Pool asks riders to walk as far as 250 metres to meet their vehicle on a route designed to most efficiently serve all riders. Express Pool, the company says, will cost riders about 50 per cent less than its standard, taxi-like UberX service, and will be as much as 30 per cent cheaper than traditional Uber Pool rides.
 
Great, now can we route them to and from GO stations?
 
Toronto taxi owners sue city for $1.7 billion over arrival of Uber, lost plate value
https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/20...on-over-arrival-of-uber-lost-plate-value.html

Good on the city to fight this. Where did the idea ever come from that a taxi plate is a transferable investment/retirement fund, as opposed to a permit to do business?

If I was the city I wouldn't settle, but instead I'd let this go through the courts, since whatever the decision the City will be free of the taxi lobby's compliant once and for all.

IMO taxi plates should have always been non-transferable. Of course most business licenses are transferable if the business is sold, for example if I buy your restaurant I get your license to run a restaurant, but is that the same as a taxi permit?
 
Last edited:
I have Uber for all of Canada/USA and Grab for Malaysia/Singapore. Grab was great, as you overcome language issues and the need to carry cash and to watch out for scams and gouging detours. Next time I'm in China I'll try Didi.

The GPS for Didi sucks. I get a lot of phone calls on where you need to be picked up. Too bad they kept their platform when they merged with Uber China.

Plus you have to be careful with Didi. A lot of drivers share an account so you have to cancel when it's not the person in the picture.
 
The GPS for Didi sucks. I get a lot of phone calls on where you need to be picked up. Too bad they kept their platform when they merged with Uber China.

Plus you have to be careful with Didi. A lot of drivers share an account so you have to cancel when it's not the person in the picture.
GTK, thanks. China's the one place I travel with cash for cabs. Too bad WeChat doesn't make it easy for foreigners to pay via its app. I love WeChat otherwise, though Beijing is reading all my texts, I'm sure.
 

Back
Top