News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.1K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.3K     0 

I saw a clip on CBC News Channel (couldn't find a link but there were similar online articles) about the climate/energy consumption impact of the massive data networks. One of the angles was images of climate change protesters all on their phones. Obviously, the networks have become more efficient (kilowatt per byte so of thing, if there is such a thing) but our massive consumption of data has skyrocketed. The article also spoke about the efforts by networks to make them more energy efficient.
 
I saw a clip on CBC News Channel (couldn't find a link but there were similar online articles) about the climate/energy consumption impact of the massive data networks. One of the angles was images of climate change protesters all on their phones. Obviously, the networks have become more efficient (kilowatt per byte so of thing, if there is such a thing) but our massive consumption of data has skyrocketed. The article also spoke about the efforts by networks to make them more energy efficient.

Follows the development of computer's hard drives. I remember the IBM 3330 and 3350 in the 1970's. Our smartphones hold much more. From link.

300px-IBM_magnetic_disk_drives_3330%2B3333.png
An IBM 3330 Direct Access Storage Facility. Shown are Three 3330s and one 3333 (on the right)

]IBM 3330
The IBM 3330 Direct Access Storage Facility, code-named Merlin, was introduced in June 1970 for use with the IBM System/370 and the IBM System 360/195. Its removable disk packs hold 100 MB (404×19×13,030 bytes) (the 1973 Model 11 featured IBM 3336-11 Disk Packs that hold 200 MB (808x19x13,030 bytes)). Access time is 30 ms and data transfers at 806 kB/s. A major advance introduced with the 3330 is the use of error correction, which makes the drives more reliable and reduced costs because small imperfections in the disk surface can be tolerated. The circuitry can correct error bursts up to 11 bits long through use of Fire codes.

IBM 3350
he IBM 3350 Direct Access Storage Facility, code-named Madrid, was introduced in 1975 for use with IBM System/370.[38] Its non-removable head-disk assemblies (HDAs) are sealed and included the head and arm assembly. The 3350 disk geometry is 555 cylinders, 30 heads, and 19,069 bytes per track, which give each HDA a storage capacity of 317,498,850 bytes. Sealed HDAs were standard practice on all IBM DASD hereafter.

Disk units are identified as Models A2, A2F, B2, B2F, C2, and C2F with each model containing two HDAs. The models are installed in strings of units with an A2 or A2F unit required and attached to a storage control such as the IBM 3830 Model 2 or the equivalent integrated storage control of a system unit. After the A2 can be up to 3 B2 units or up to 2 B2s and a C2. The C2 unit also connects to a storage control and serves as a secondary path to itself and the A2 and B2 units. When using a C2 two I/O operations could simultaneously take place on the string, one via an A2 and a second via the C2. The valid 3350 strings are: -A, -AB, -ABB, -ABBB, -AC-, -ABC-, or -ABBC- configurations.

The "x2F", as in Model A2F, unit is a normal x2 unit, but its two HDAs also have a Fixed Head area over the first five cylinders, thereby reducing[c] seek time to zero for these five cylinders. This fixed head area is intended to be allocated to the frequently accessed HASP or JES2 checkpoint area and thus greatly reduce head motion on the SPOOL device. The fixed head area can also be utilized for TSO swap data (MVT and SVS) and system swap data (MVS) wherein the swap data for SVS and MVS consist of blocks of pages that have been in memory when an address space is selected for swap-out; those pages need not be contiguous and in general do not include pages that have not been modified since their last page-in. This system architecture greatly improves context switches between TSO users or batch regions.

The IBM 3350 family was withdrawn in September 1994.
 
There is an image on another forum I follow of four men struggling to haul a device - about 8'x8'x3' - up a loading ramp; a 5MB IBM hard drive.

The original computer used by NORAD (reputedly the largest computers ever built) covered about 1/2 acre, weighed 250 tons, had ~60,000 vacuum tubes and gobbled about 3Kw of power. 256K of RAM. Each site had two.
 
Carbon neutrality is basically a joke at this point.

On the positive side for Canada our electrical production is some of the least carbon reliant in the world so further electrification of transport and building operations holds promise.

Doing some quick research you can see how low the prospects are for carbon emission reduction around the world. The US and China are basically totally reliant on fossil fuels for their electric grids as are supposed environmental champions like Germany and even Denmark
 
There is an image on another forum I follow of four men struggling to haul a device - about 8'x8'x3' - up a loading ramp; a 5MB IBM hard drive.

The original computer used by NORAD (reputedly the largest computers ever built) covered about 1/2 acre, weighed 250 tons, had ~60,000 vacuum tubes and gobbled about 3Kw of power. 256K of RAM. Each site had two.

Nowadays, they look at "shared computing". From link. Many computers (businesses and homes) share their computing resources.

Imagine that you've been assigned the task of pushing a very heavy car up a hill. You're allowed to recruit people who aren't doing anything else to help you move the car. You've got two choices: You can look around for one person big and strong enough to do it all by him or herself, or you could grab several average people to push together. While you might eventually find someone large enough to push the car alone, most of the time it will be easier to just gather a group of average-sized people. It might sound strange, but shared computer systems use the same principle.

When a computational problem is really complex, it can take a single computer a long time to process it -- millions of days, in some cases. Even supercomputers have processing limitations. They're also rare and expensive. Many research facilities require a lot of computational power, but don't have access to a supercomputer. For these organizations, shared computing is often an attractive alternative to supercomputers.

Shared computing is a kind of high-performance computing. A shared computing system is a network of computers that work together to accomplish a specific task. Each computer donates part of its processing power -- and sometimes other resources -- to help achieve a goal. By networking thousands of computers together, a shared computing system can equal or even surpass the processing power of a supercomputer.

Most of the time, your computer isn't using all of its computational resources. There are other times when you might have your computer on, but aren't actually using it. A shared computing system takes advantage of these resources that otherwise would remain unused.

Shared computing systems are great for certain complex problems, but aren't useful for others. They can be complicated to design and administer. While several computer scientists are working on a way to standardize shared computing systems, many existing systems rely on unique hardware, software and architecture.
 
Nowadays, they look at "shared computing". From link. Many computers (businesses and homes) share their computing resources.

Ya, a buddy of mine does that.

I can guarantee you that defence, public safety and likely banking don't farm out their data networks.
 
Wind Turbines Are Not Killing Fields for Birds

From link.

President Trump (and Premier Doug Ford) continues his years' long dispute with wind turbines, claiming that wind turbines diminish home property values, cause cancer, and “kill all the birds.”
Wind turbines have not been found to diminish home values of nearby properties or cause cancer. According to numbers aggregated by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, cats are a bigger scrooge to the overall bird community than wind turbines. The most recent estimate places the number of bird deaths at the paws of cats at 2.4 billion. Collisions from wind turbines on land killed a small fraction of birds in comparison to the damage that cats and glass buildings cause to the general bird population. Land wind turbines were responsible for over 200,000 bird deaths while collisions from building glass are estimated to be responsible for nearly 600 million bird deaths. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service did not provide estimates for deaths resulting from offshore wind turbines.

As the wind power industry grows and expands, the renewable’s relationship to its environment is coming under more intense scrutiny. While the relationship between wind turbines and different types of bird populations, particularly apex birds, is understudied, there is some evidence that turbines can hurt those populations. Hawaii, home to many endangered species, has taken extra steps to protect species that could be vulnerable to wind energy. The state requires all potential wind projects on both private and public land to have permits and conservation plans for the bird and bat population. Hawaii also documents animal mortality data from independent, third-party experts, with some wind farms subjected to steep fines for killing any federally protected birds.

As wind turbines become more common, reforms in this spirit could help alleviate some of the drawbacks of the new energy source.

15195.jpeg
 
The bushfires in Australia are so big they're generating their own weather — 'pyrocumulonimbus' thunderstorms that can start more fires

From link.

5e09f784954bda273b24a142


The bushfires in Australia are now so big that they are generating their own weather, in the form of giant thunderstorms that start more fires, according to the Bureau of Meteorology in Victoria.

"Pyro-cumulonimbus clouds have developed to altitudes over 16km in East #Gippsland this afternoon. These fire-induced storms can spread fires through lightning, lofting of embers and generation of severe wind outflows," the bureau tweeted on Monday.

Intense fires generate smoke, obviously. But their heat can also create a localized updraft powerful enough to create its own changes in the atmosphere above. As the heat and smoke rise, the cloud plume can cool off, generating a large, puffy cloud full of potential rain. The plume can also scatter embers and hot ash over a wider area.

Eventually, water droplets in the cloud condense, generating a downburst of rain — maybe. But the "front" between the calm air outside the fire zone and a pyrocumulonimbus stormcloud is so sharp that it also generates lightning — and that can start new fires.

If powerful enough, a pyrocumulonimbus storm can generate a fire tornado, which happened during the Canberra bushfires in 2003.

Scientists worry that "pyroCbs" are on the rise around the world, driven by warmer temperatures and more intense fires, Yale E360 reported. Their plumes are so strong that they can even shoot smoke into the stratosphere, 6 to 30 miles above the Earth's surface.
 
New Zealand glaciers turn brown and 'could melt faster because of Australia's bushfires'

From link.

Smoke and ash drifting from the Australian bushfires have caused New Zealand's glaciers to turn caramel brown, with one expert fearing this could increase the risk of them melting faster this year.

A jet stream transporting large amounts of smoke and ash this week from the blazes in Victoria and New South Wales deposited them along the way in New Zealand's South Island as they traveled east, according to CNN meteorologist Michael Guy...
 
Denmark’s wind power production is now up to 49%! The renewable energy poster children are now almost as green as Canada ;)
 
Denmark’s wind power production is now up to 49%! The renewable energy poster children are now almost as green as Canada ;)

Wind meets Denmark's 100% power demand on Sep 15

From link.

Wind power generation covered 100% of Denmark’s electricity demand for the first time ever on September 15, according to preliminary statistics by the country's transmission system operator Energinet.

The strong winds spurred production from wind turbines and helped supply 130% of the country's electricity demand from midnight to midnight last Sunday. The excess power was sold abroad.

Between 0200 and 0300 local time wind parks were generating up to 60% more electricity than the country needed at that time, which broke an earlier record from June 9, 2019, when wind turbine production exceeded consumption by 52%.

“Just 10 years ago, winds only filled about one-fifth of our supply, so things have gone insanely strong when we have not just hours, but all day where wind turbines produce more electricity than we need,” said Energinet’s energy strategic advisor Carsten Vittrup.

Data by industry body WindEurope indicates that at end-2018, Denmark's cumulative installed wind power capacity amounted to 5,758 MW.

Denmark mulls construction of $44.5B mega wind farm

From link.

Denmark is investigating the possibility of building one or more “energy islands” with a capacity to produce 10,000 megawatts of offshore wind power, the country’s energy and climate ministry said Tuesday.

The project would need between 200-300 billion krones ($29.6-$44.5 billion) in investment, of which the majority would be met by the private sector, Kallanish Energy reports.

The government has allocated 65 million krones ($9.65 million) under next year’s budget to invest in the development of technologies to store and convert the large amounts of power the island would produce, as well as preliminary studies on the project.

“The concept of ‘energy island’ covers a physical island or platform that acts as a hub for electricity generation from surrounding offshore wind farms that are connected and distributed between North Sea countries,” it explained.

The government is now screening potential places, which include areas of the Baltic Sea, North Sea and Kattegat. Ongoing studies must prove feasibility before further commitments are made.

Denmark has legally committed to cut its greenhouse gas emissions by 70% by 2030, compared to the 1990 level, with the ultimate goal to reach net zero emissions by 2050 “at the latest.”

The Danish nation built the world’s first offshore wind farm in 1991.
 
See Where Australia’s Deadly Wildfires Are Burning

From link.

Days into the New Year, deadly wildfires, fueled by wind and scorching summer heat, continued to rage across Australia’s southeast.

1578023023985.png


Toronto, Australia is located on the coast mid-way between Sydney and Newcastle.

Thousands of tourists and residents have been forced to evacuate from areas along the southeast coast so far, and tens of thousands more are fleeing to safer ground ahead of the weekend, with forecasters predicting a new round of dangerous fire conditions.

High winds and temperatures reaching close to 100 degrees Fahrenheit, or about 38 Celsius, are expected starting Friday.

Australia’s 2019 fire season started early and has been exceptionally brutal, experts say, even for a country used to regular burning.

Wildfires have scorched millions of acres of land across the country since October, destroying more than a thousand homes and killing at least 18 people, including three volunteer firefighters.

The most-affected state, New South Wales, which includes Sydney, Australia’s largest city, is having its worst fire season in 20 years.
 

Back
Top