News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.6K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 41K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.4K     0 

As someone who is pro (within reason) nuclear, I take issue with that statement - nuclear fusion in the sun is utterly different from nuclear fission of transuranic elements.

AoD
Are you saying you're only pro fusion, and not fission?

Fission power has a lot of potential and can be designed to be quite safe and leave minimal, and rather short lived waste. There is a lot of development going on, particularly by Canadian firms, of new reactor technology. Fission is going to be very important, particularly for providing industrial heat, where other renewable energy forms will struggle to displace fossil fuels.
 
Are you saying you're only pro fusion, and not fission?

Fission power has a lot of potential and can be designed to be quite safe and leave minimal, and rather short lived waste. There is a lot of development going on, particularly by Canadian firms, of new reactor technology. Fission is going to be very important, particularly for providing industrial heat, where other renewable energy forms will struggle to displace fossil fuels.

Pro-fission (fusion isn't available yet). Anyways while I agree the trend towards safer designs, some of the issues are particularly recalcitrant and proposed solutions aren't anywhere near ready for prime time (e.g. actinide burning for waste disposal; breeder reactors for U235 shortage, etc).

AoD
 

Or maybe not if they restructure themselves to be headquartered in some third world tax haven. The issue with pollution (plastic water bottles) could be solved with a tax/cost recovery scheme that makes it prohibitive for consumers who seem to be unable to walk around without a plastic bottle of water in hand (or a disposable coffee cup for that matter). It's a social phenomenon that has been largely driven by marketing - tap water = bad), or increase the cost to suck it out of the ground at the current ridiculously low rate.
 
For better or for worse, we have an energy sector that generates substantial revenue and good paying jobs. Killing it would be a massive economic problem for Canada.

What we need is more sincere action than the somewhat convenient tokenism the Liberals have resorted to with a carbon tax that exempts methane emissions, agriculture and aviation.
 
They government's new climate plan is out. And it is extremely ambitious.


But they keep approving more offshore drilling projects.

 
CNN: 2020 smashed the record for billion-dollar weather and climate disasters, NOAA says
210107163902-billion-dollar-disasters-2020-exlarge-169.jpg

(CNN) 2020 will be remembered for many unpleasant reasons -- the global pandemic, political unrest, sky-high unemployment -- and now we can add a record number of billion-dollar weather and climate disasters to the list.
An astonishing 22 separate weather and climate disasters costing over $1 billion each occurred in the US in 2020, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) announced Friday.

This shatters the annual record of 16 costly disasters in both 2011 and 2017.

"This is the sixth year in a row that the US has experienced 10 or more separate billion-dollar disasters," NOAA climatologist Adam Smith told CNN Weather. Ten disasters has become the more recent standard of what to expect in a year, he added.

"To more than double (the number of events) at 22 and then have six more than the previous record is pretty extreme," Smith said.

Making up this costly list are a record-setting seven tropical cyclone events and 13 severe storm events, along with a drought and a wildfire event.

The cost of disasters is estimated using data from insured and uninsured losses and covers the private and public sectors.
The cost last year was double the average

The cumulative cost of these disasters in 2020 is $95 billion, the fourth-highest total annual cost since 1980, behind 2017, 2005 and 2012 (all inflation-adjusted to 2020 dollars).

"This is more than double the 41-year average annual cost," Smith said.

The costliest event of 2020 was Hurricane Laura, racking up $19 billion in damage, followed by the historic Western wildfires at $16.5 billion and the August derecho through the Midwest, totaling $11 billion in damage.
U.S. breaks record for billion-dollar weather and climate disasters in 2020
2020 tied the record for the warmest year on record, and the world also grappled with historic wildfires and hurricanes. The U.S. saw an unprecedented 22 disasters with damages of $1 billion or more. CBS News meteorologist and climate specialist Jeff Berardelli joins CBSN to explain.
 
But they keep approving more offshore drilling projects.

The way to reduce oil is to actually build and fund the alternatives. Asking Canadians to commit economic suicide for a climate outcome they should be worried about decades from now is not a winning strategy.

I am optimistic oil use will go down far quicker than people anticipate. That won't come by hectoring governments on rig permits. That will happen with massive investments in clean power, electric and hydrogen vehicles, urbanization, etc.

We can spend a decade fighting oil companies or a decade developing EVs, building charging infrastructure and driving down the cost so much that nobody would ever choose a gas car. The latter strategy is a smarter one in my books. Even if it's boring to activists.
 
The way to reduce oil is to actually build and fund the alternatives. Asking Canadians to commit economic suicide for a climate outcome they should be worried about decades from now is not a winning strategy.

I am optimistic oil use will go down far quicker than people anticipate. That won't come by hectoring governments on rig permits. That will happen with massive investments in clean power, electric and hydrogen vehicles, urbanization, etc.

We can spend a decade fighting oil companies or a decade developing EVs, building charging infrastructure and driving down the cost so much that nobody would ever choose a gas car. The latter strategy is a smarter one in my books. Even if it's boring to activists.
Subsidies are horrendously expensive and ineffective. Pricing carbon and distributing the funds back to taxpayers provides the incentive to make investments to reduce emissions and doesn't waste money giving $10k to someone to buy an electric Porsche he would have bought anyway.
 

Back
Top