Re: PCL: Metropolis Update June 1/06
ED007 - "Boy are you ever a fountain of negativity. And not just in this post but in seemingly every post lately. Is there nothing that you like in this city?"
I guess I am guilty of assuming that a featured discussion on a major radio station, regarding one of the most discussed projects on this forum might be of interest to those who didn't hear it. What's more I don't believe I claimed to be in agreeance with those opinions or not. On the contrary, on the same day before posting above I posted the following regarding Dundas Square in another thread:
"Dundas Square is actually turning out quite nice, certainly in comparison to the way it was before. I was walking through the Eaton Centre last weekend to dodge the rain and I really did get a sense of being drawn through the place to the outside square, the action outside seeming far more interesting to me, crass commercialism and all. Then again, the commercialism inside the mall is fairly crass too. The Eaton Centre truly feels like a mall, albeit a spectacular one, while Dundas Square manages to feel like a place where one can just hang and be, enjoying the sites and sounds."
Does the above post qualify as an example of the negativity to which you refer, or is it honest criticism or opposing ideas that you don't like?
Archivist: "tudar can be a bit of bore sometimes frankly. Who else would take to heart and re-transmit in such detail the opinions of people who call into to radio talk shows?"
(ducking a gratuitous cheap shot) Archivist's elitist and boorish editorializing notwithstanding, I do believe that there are those out there who may be interested to know what the hoi polloi feel about the square.
"Anyways, perhaps those people who called in have never been to Europe? Not that uncommon to find mostly treeless ad-laden squares in Europe, or in Buenos Aires, New York, Tokyo etc."
Thanks for setting that straight, Archivist.