November 16, 2016 - Windows!
IMG_20161116_165134285_HDR.jpg
IMG_20161116_165209232_HDR.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20161116_165134285_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20161116_165134285_HDR.jpg
    469.1 KB · Views: 1,241
  • IMG_20161116_165209232_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20161116_165209232_HDR.jpg
    383.1 KB · Views: 1,261
HP have recently shown to be light years ahead of others when it comes to glass too.
 
I am not familiar with the development process, but is that a case where the architect gave the developer two choices (or so) with regards to windows, and the developer simply picked the cheaper version? I realise that I am simplifying things, but is this how decisions are sometimes made?

(asking for a friend)
 
This could be quite a bit cheaper. You're getting full-height panes here, without the waist-height mullion that makes a mess of so many buildings. You're also getting windows, mullions, and spandrels that are all tinted similarly here, minimizing the clutter. Yes, they could have spent more on capless curtainwall, but this does not strike me as particularly cheap either.

42
 
Windows being installed.
IMG_2900.JPG
IMG_2901.JPG
IMG_2903.JPG
IMG_2904.JPG
IMG_2905.JPG
IMG_2906.JPG
IMG_2907.JPG
IMG_2908.JPG
IMG_2909.JPG
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2900.JPG
    IMG_2900.JPG
    719.4 KB · Views: 302
  • IMG_2901.JPG
    IMG_2901.JPG
    982.4 KB · Views: 343
  • IMG_2903.JPG
    IMG_2903.JPG
    839.5 KB · Views: 336
  • IMG_2904.JPG
    IMG_2904.JPG
    870.8 KB · Views: 410
  • IMG_2905.JPG
    IMG_2905.JPG
    989 KB · Views: 306
  • IMG_2906.JPG
    IMG_2906.JPG
    1.1 MB · Views: 340
  • IMG_2907.JPG
    IMG_2907.JPG
    766.6 KB · Views: 314
  • IMG_2908.JPG
    IMG_2908.JPG
    832.4 KB · Views: 414
  • IMG_2909.JPG
    IMG_2909.JPG
    973.5 KB · Views: 331
Think they'll replace the off coloured precast panel? It's probably too heavy to do later, no?
 

Back
Top