Koops65
Senior Member
Here is a quick render I made with a 220 metre generic tower on the site for context:
Merry Christmas all!
Merry Christmas all!
it's 12.5m to the centreline of the laneway, so they are fully meeting the requirement to the south. The east setback is indeed less, but it's facing a relatively new condo building which is already too small to be a tower site.Hmmm, separation distances may be an issue here:
View attachment 292436
The south side is within reach......but they show 12.5M to beyond their property line; so they are only conceding, I think, about 9.5M which if redevelopment occurred to the south would compel a 14.5M concession.
Side separation appears to be only 5.5M to the east.
I wonder if they have an agreement w/the neighbours..........
I mean the distances work, if there is no redevelopment on the adjacent properties; or if those properties go up enough to allow them to move back from their side of the property line.
Boring, uninspiring, bland & doesn't have any heritage architecture element.Here are a couple of screenshots of the renders from the application document [Source]View attachment 292422
View attachment 292421
Yeah! What's with this city even The One condo wants more height from 85 to 94 storeys. Wow! New York City we will become in time !!The condos are getting taller
At least New York has interesting designs incorporated in their condos. All we see here is the same repetitive crap, rinsed and diluted 100's of times over.Yeah! What's with this city even The One condo wants more height from 85 to 94 storeys. Wow! New York City we will become in time !!
Hopefully without its filth and rude peopleYeah! What's with this city even The One condo wants more height from 85 to 94 storeys. Wow! New York City we will become in time !!