1) Barely on topic.
2) True.
3) Huh. I didn't know those existed.
42
2) True.
3) Huh. I didn't know those existed.
42
1) Barely on topic.
2) True.
3) Huh. I didn't know those existed.
42
I really think this development is inappropriate for the site. It would be better for a beautiful stone or brick midrise--ie under 10 storeys--on this site. Retail here is likely to be a failure.
I really think this development is inappropriate for the site. It would be better for a beautiful stone or brick midrise--ie under 10 storeys--on this site. Retail here is likely to be a failure.
Under 10 storeys a preferable form for a site not just near, but right next to, a busy transit station?
Hard to believe this is the area surrounding a rapid transit stop. It's nice to see areas like this and Kipling Station finally getting some density.
Mimico GO is not the same context as Front and Spadina.