Northern Light
Superstar
Former Councillor Joe Mehevc has been retained to lobby on this one.
Client remains NJS Capital.
Client remains NJS Capital.
- Thread starter innsertnamehere
- Start date
Northern Light
Superstar
Request for Direction Report to oppose this one at OLT headed to the next meeting of TEYCC:
Shadow Impacts loom large here (pun intended).......both on the neighbourhood but also on Winchester and Winchester Square Parks
Setbacks are also noted as issues.
One other notable here, the City's records show 44 apartments here, but the proponent is only proposing to replace 32.
There are additional, mostly minor matters.
Shadow Impacts loom large here (pun intended).......both on the neighbourhood but also on Winchester and Winchester Square Parks
Setbacks are also noted as issues.
One other notable here, the City's records show 44 apartments here, but the proponent is only proposing to replace 32.
There are additional, mostly minor matters.
Northern Light
Superstar
NJS Capital (the proponent here) just registered to lobby on this one, effective today.
This one is already before the OLT.
Hmmmm
No new Docs u/l.
This one is already before the OLT.
Hmmmm
No new Docs u/l.
HousingNowTO
Senior Member
Brand new Councillor in the ward, all new staff in his office... if you want to talk to any of them about your active development file - you will need to register all over again.NJS Capital (the proponent here) just registered to lobby on this one, effective today.
This one is already before the OLT.
Hmmmm
No new Docs u/l.
Lenser
Senior Member
I think it looks dated and drab, too - the tower portion, at least. As for the one protruding box on that inset darker floor - well, it looks like a shopworn architectural cliché.
ProjectEnd
Superstar
July resubmission here. Lost 10 storeys and is now preserving the south heritage building in its entirety:
Northern Light
Superstar
Less bad, still not remotely good.
artyboy123
Senior Member
UtakataNoAnnex
Senior Member
...I think it actually looks more terrible. /sigh
artyboy123
Senior Member
New renderings are updated in the database. The total storey count changed from 49 storey to 39 storey. Height also changed from 154.50m to 129.04m. Finally, the car parking was reduced from 92 parking to 8 parking.
Rendering taken from the architectural plan via SPA.
Rendering taken from the architectural plan via SPA.
Northern Light
Superstar
This one is on the agenda for tomorrow's Council meeting in the form of a Request for Direction Report:
We can reasonably infer the settlement above constituted a settlement offer.
We can reasonably infer the settlement above constituted a settlement offer.
fredsintown
New Member
Retaining the 2 walkups? WHY!
Northern Light
Superstar
None of us really followed up on this...........
The Settlement was adopted by Council.
The renders and details are consistent with @ProjectEnd 's post above mine.
There is one notable here though, which I assume @HousingNowTO duly recorded, but just in case, I will flag here:
****
@fredsintown a good question. Nominally, for heritage reasons. But if you read back.....you'll find some discussion, including by me, suggesting that retaining these for said purpose was not merited.
I completely get the idea of building a compatible podium level w/nearby heritage, (ie. brick, traditional styling), but we could have done much better replacing than retaining here, in my opinion.
I should add for clarity only one of the old apartments is being saved entirely, the other is having its facade retained.
Last edited: