officedweller
Senior Member
PS - some of those carpet remants could make reasonable doormats.
Yep, I'm certainly not pinning this solely on Silver Hotels. Hence "everyone involved" - from the City on down.To be fair, it is a private property - the owner really isn't under any moral obligation to continue the arrangement. The city's response on the other hand has been wanting. We have umpteen community centres - can't they at least even think about turning a few indoor basketball courts or activity rooms into emergency shelters?
AoD
As the temperature hits -9 and I fear some may not make it through the night, I sure am glad they kicked a whole bunch of less fortunate people out so that a second-rate hotel could 'rejuvenate' their shitty offering. Pat yourselves on the back, everyone involved. Job well done.
Who would have set up a contract with a Dec 31 end date? (Original and/or extended) History would say you never kick people out in the winter. Surely the City could have spent the money more effectively but I guess this is what happens when big government moves quicker than they are capable of.Yep, I'm certainly not pinning this solely on Silver Hotels. Hence "everyone involved" - from the City on down.
no I'm not being sarcastic, I'm being honest, bit of a stretch on this board I know but there it is......I am hoping you are being sarcastic...right?
AoD
The application might be an attempt to up the property value. A prime site downtown is valuable but a prime site with planning permission is much better on the balance sheet.
My understanding is that the proposal is for Condos, Hotel and Retail per the database entry. So It's giving as much back as the current building does in terms of "participating in the community" hotel-wise. Just with additional units for people to live in as well.I'm so angry about this proposal I can hardly stand it. Novotel was a part of our community and now the balance sheet watchers want to upend the entire neighbourhood for years with demolition, site clean up and multi-story rebuild. Does no one look at the waste this will produce? The landfill it will create? And what the end result will contribute to the community? At least with a hotel it participates in the community. Unbelievable.
No, that has to be an illusion...as it's usually big government moves too slowly than they're capable of. And oft deliberately so. /sighWho would have set up a contract with a Dec 31 end date? (Original and/or extended) History would say you never kick people out in the winter. Surely the City could have spent the money more effectively but I guess this is what happens when big government moves quicker than they are capable of.
Anything in particular? If this ends up as 55 Mercer-quality IBI (which the design language seems to emulate), I think it'd be fine.Nope. Send it back.
Anything in particular? If this ends up as 55 Mercer-quality IBI (which the design language seems to emulate), I think it'd be fine.
This is a huge improvement but I agree that it still needs a few tweaks, particularly relating to street level. Some better articulation of the pedestrian scale and perhaps a more varied street facade would work. This is a really long building, there should be an effort to create some visual variety along its length or something. 55 Mercer manages that much quite nicely and it's not nearly as long.Anything in particular? If this ends up as 55 Mercer-quality IBI (which the design language seems to emulate), I think it'd be fine.