NeilV
Active Member
I wonder if the 17-storey base building will be office space to replace what they're demolishing? It could easily reach ~260m if so.
Yup I think so but a similar design has just popped up on 53-55 Yonge Street today which is beautiful .Is this golden design now scrapped?
In all honesty, the Yonge design runs laps around this one, quite impressive.Yup I think so but a similar design has just popped up on 53-55 Yonge Street today which is beautiful .
It was a placeholder of sorts from what I gather. Doesn't stop any actual design from being gold as well.Is this golden design now scrapped?
It was a placeholder of sorts from what I gather.
I'd like to agree with you...but I don't think we're the only city in the world that has proposals with fantastical placeholders in their renders.And an indication of how much further Toronto still has to go. In top cities beautiful designs are the intended end result and get built. In Toronto we just draw mirages of what we'd like to build but have no intention of building. If we want to be taken seriously as a top global metropolis like New York we need to be top shelf in EVERYTHING we do. Settling for stuff that would be a nice building in Edmonton won't get us there.
I mean yea toronto isn’t unique in this sense... everywhere does this. I mean in other cities it's more common than here to never finish a mega project even if it already under construction, so we’re ahead in that regard.And an indication of how much further Toronto still has to go. In top cities beautiful designs are the intended end result and get built. In Toronto we just draw mirages of what we'd like to build but have no intention of building. If we want to be taken seriously as a top global metropolis like New York we need to be top shelf in EVERYTHING we do. Settling for stuff that would be a nice building in Edmonton won't get us there.
And an indication of how much further Toronto still has to go. In top cities beautiful designs are the intended end result and get built. In Toronto we just draw mirages of what we'd like to build but have no intention of building. If we want to be taken seriously as a top global metropolis like New York we need to be top shelf in EVERYTHING we do. Settling for stuff that would be a nice building in Edmonton won't get us there.
I mean yea toronto isn’t unique in this sense... everywhere does this. I mean in other cities it's more common than here to never finish a mega project even if it already under construction, so we’re ahead in that regard.
Since Toronto is starting to become a high tech leader in North America. These tech enthusiast should create big high tech mechanical drones. That can attach complicated facade parts like a puzzle to these skyscraper. Creating the original vidual rendering facades that the architect designed. So we don't have to go through cheap final result like Mirvish gehry development for eg.And an indication of how much further Toronto still has to go. In top cities beautiful designs are the intended end result and get built. In Toronto we just draw mirages of what we'd like to build but have no intention of building. If we want to be taken seriously as a top global metropolis like New York we need to be top shelf in EVERYTHING we do. Settling for stuff that would be a nice building in Edmonton won't get us there.
False equivalence. Comparing the standards being discussed for a redevelopment proposal on our Mink Mile with an old existing grocery store in Harlem does not help support your point.With great respect, NYC is far from top-shelf in much of what it does.
The same could be said of London, Paris, or Tokyo.
It's perfectly fine to admire other places for one aspect of things they tend to do better than Toronto on average; or a particular project that is just exceptional; but it's really hyperbolic to take that from the specific to the general.
This is a fine example of NYC architecture:
View attachment 305900
And the adjacent public realm:
View attachment 305901
Let's be clear, NYC has lots of great buildings, streetscapes and parks.
Those are praise-worthy.
But it's not every building or streetscape or park.
While Toronto is definitely not at New York levels yet, as others have mentioned New York has plenty of mediocre projects as well. When it's not your city, the only projects you really gravitate towards or see are the major ones and the really well done ones.And an indication of how much further Toronto still has to go. In top cities beautiful designs are the intended end result and get built. In Toronto we just draw mirages of what we'd like to build but have no intention of building. If we want to be taken seriously as a top global metropolis like New York we need to be top shelf in EVERYTHING we do. Settling for stuff that would be a nice building in Edmonton won't get us there.
False equivalence. Comparing the standards being discussed for a redevelopment proposal on our Mink Mile with an old existing grocery store in Harlem does not help support your point.
The watering down of proposals happens everywhere and people need to understand that renders really don't mean much in the grand scheme of things. Anyone can get a shiny render made but it's really what's in the SPA that matters ultimately with regards to how something will pan out.