I don't know if anyone else has caught this but around noon'ish, whenever it's sunny out, there is a MASSIVE glare bouncing off the building.
Just as I suspected. The true purpose of these buildings - to harness the power of the sun and use it for evil!
^That plot of land reminds me of Tridel's Essex site. Makes me think Tridel could have gotten away with this kind of height in ECC. Just think how amazing it would look to have two towers like this in the distance as you come along Dundas from the west.
Because most of Etobicoke's 'ambitious city building' and tower construction is occurring by the lake. ECC is a forgotten emblem of Metro's suburban employment centres that never materialized.I don't get why the architecture at ECC is so dull, though ambitious city building was never characteristic of Etobicoke. While driving eastbound on Bloor at Six Points, the ECC skyline looks impressive in terms of density. Yet there is no standout tower, just a lot of acceptable but not outstanding towers. I'm not expecting Absolute's calibre of design, but it's really lacking in some true landmarks.
Because most of Etobicoke's 'ambitious city building' and tower construction is occurring by the lake. ECC is a forgotten emblem of Metro's suburban employment centres that never materialized.
The pedestrian and civic centre of gravity for Etobicoke has always been the Kingsway strip of Bloor a few blocks east. Between Royal York and Old Mill is one of the quaintest strips in the city imo.
Just as I suspected. The true purpose of these buildings - to harness the power of the sun and use it for evil!
Though Humber Bay has turned out to be a beautiful place, as a neighbourhood, it's more suburban than the mixed-use, vibrant urban area I had in mind. Maybe ECC was an "emblem of Metro's suburban employment centres", but North York and Scarborough seemed to take it seriously as a part civic, part economic endeavor. (ECC certainly isn't forgotten as the recent development boom has shown.) North York and Scarborough built attractive city halls and squares. They sought quality high-rise development and their city centres feel like real endeavors in city building with adequate placemaking.
On the other hand, Bloor in the Kingsway feels local, with an attractive, landscaped, public realm but mostly boring single or two-storey lowrise buildings. It's a great strip, but not an example of city building with ambition.
I don't find anything ambitious about STC.. It's hideous, covered in concrete and anchored by a large, crappy mall surrounded by factories and that plant by Ellesmere station that makes the entire neighbourhood smell like farts.
NYCC is the only suburban city centre worth mentioning. That is also because of its relative size compared to the other boroughs and the fact that it is relatively well served by three subway lines (counting the Spadina line as another).