BrianSolo
UT Member
I thought the ice was falling from the crane on top of Aura.
No use crying over spilt milk, but...
I remain deeply puzzled over how this whole ROCP & Aura blight came to pass. The old Eaton building at College Park is as grand as any in Toronto. Add the fact there is a parkette in the centre of the block. With virtually an entire block to work with why did the City not demand an international contest? This is critical intersection. We turned a blind eye while a Canderel Stoneridge staff architect 'threw up' 180 floors. The funny part is there seems to be some Gothic accents in the Bay Street flying buttresses. It they had used the old Deco department store for context we could've had a masterpiece on par with Rockefeller centre. Toronto-for-ya, harass M/G but red carpet for C/S. Robert Stern could've done something special here he's strong on neo-Deco.
There should be an en-qui-ry.
I wouldn't give much credit to Canderel for their three disasters on this block. The other buildings would have come along just the same, and they are finer than anything parked here for the next hundred or so years. I tend to agree with buildup's previous post, a tremendous opportunity was lost here when building more residential around College Park and not pulling from a treasured and established success (the old Eaton's store). But that takes civic pride and money, heaven forbid this developer would spend extra money designing and putting up good looking buildings, not to suggest that they are exclusively the problem in this city.
And now they are planning to deposit more of their bargain basement design build garbage on the north side of College.
When will the city finally say enough is enough?
Any developer looking to build in the Yonge-Bay corridor needs to be held to the design and construction standards being set in the area by Great Gulf, Lanterra and MOD...full stop.
And now they are planning to deposit more of their bargain basement design build garbage on the north side of College.
City is too busy fighting M-G.
There is, I think, a difference between an accident (falling trees) to what is probably a design defect (ice forming and crashing to the street). Closing streets is very expensive - directly and indirectly - to the City and to citizens (and those whose businesses are behind barriers.)
Dude. Can you please stop bringing Mirvish-Gehry and your related bitterness about Toronto city planners into every single thread? Seriously.