steveintoronto
Superstar
All addressed in the many articles on-line. That vector is easily factored for comparison, as many articles on the matter have. What's harder to compensate comparisons for is the business model:They're comparing a system that only had 500 bikes to a system that has 4000 bikes...it's a shitty comparison. Of course more bikes is going to result in an increase in ridership.
https://www.bicycling.com/news/advo...keshares-and-one-problem-they-need-to/slide/1[...]
But competition is coming. Not long after Seattle’s Pronto bikeshare program closed, two replacements hit the streets: LimeBike and Spin. Both are for-profit, privately operated systems backed by venture capital firms, which is a relatively new entry in bikeshare. “The old ways aren’t disappearing,” says Herr. “But the trend is diversification.”
LimeBike started in January with $12 million in funding, including support from well-known tech VC firm Andreesen Horowitz. Spin launched in 2016 with $8 million in initial funding. The key? Both Spin and LimeBike are dockless systems (read more below). Without the physical footprint of stations, operators don’t have to jump through the usual hoops for operating, like responding to a city’s RFP (request for proposal) or winning a franchise; a simple business permit does the trick.
Is VC-backed bikeshare the wave of the future?
“Ask me in five years!” says Herr. “It’s an interesting iteration, but it’s important to keep the perspective that bikeshare is a young industry, and it’s changing rapidly.”
[...]
See also:
https://www.bicycling.com/culture/will-dockless-bike-share-sweep-the-nation
https://techcrunch.com/2017/11/10/b...regulator-and-launches-in-a-dozen-new-cities/Bike-share platform Spin poaches Seattle transit regulator and launches in a dozen new cities
Posted Nov 10, 2017 by Devin Coldewey
Spin, one of several dockless bike-sharing companies now vying for dominance in a number of U.S. cities, has a new weapon to wield against its competitors: Kyle Rowe, the architect of Seattle’s permissive and apparently successful bike-share permit system, who is joining the company to work on government partnerships. In addition, Spin is gearing up to launch in a dozen or so new cities all around the country.
I met Rowe in Seattle this summer, funnily enough at a launch party for Spin’s well-funded Chinese rival Ofo. He and the team at the Seattle Department of Transportation had put together an attractively simple process for launching dockless bike sharing in the city. It made things easy on operators while still holding them to fairly rigorous standards and requiring them to share certain valuable data so it could be used by transit officials and other companies.
This has allowed, for instance, apps like Transit and Migo to add multiple bike-share companies to their maps of local transportation options (although payments are still only available in the individual services’ apps):
[...]
This is going to get interesting, as Minnan-Wong is the man behind Toronto's purchase of the failed Bixi. It is also a substantial cost to the City, and M-W claims to be an 'architect of free enterprise'. The private bike-shares actually *produce money* for the cities they operate in. We'll see how M-W handles this...