Councillor Bradford is working on the move to 45m.
Love the expansion, but the existing 30 min limit/$4 overage sucks.
I agree that the 30 minute limit is an annoyance. Especially in the winter, when I'm wearing thick mittens.
I really wish they either upped the time to 45 min
This might decrease bike availability on busy days. It would also reduce overage revenue, which helps to pay for rebalancing and whatnot. On the other hand, it might help to increase revenue from membership and pass sales. Overall, I'm not sure whether or not 30 or 45 minutes is the best limit. I wonder if any city has ever changed their time limit and published a report of the outcomes. If not, maybe Toronto could try a pilot project.
[Edit: If you'd like a source for my claim that a 45-minute trip limit would decrease overage revenue, please see
this later post.]
One possible solution, for now, would be to sell "regular" yearly memberships with a 30-minute limit, and "premium" yearly memberships with a 45- or 60-minute limit. I think some other cities might already do this.
or cut the overage fee for the first extra 30 min to $1.50 like before
When the new overage scheme was first proposed,
this PDF seemed to suggest that the new scheme would reduce confusion and complaints from short-term system users.
The same PDF also predicted that the new overage scheme would increase total revenue, but I wonder whether or not that actually happened. When the cost of overage increases, people will try harder to avoid overage. I wonder whether or not the city has analyzed the data and looked at how the change actually has affected total revenue.