Why does it always have to be form follows function?

I prefer whimsy leads function.

Whimsy is good especially if it leads to function (the truly great Architects are always able to combine both) however when I look at this design it appears that function has been sacrificed somewhat. If balconeys are a selling point (and they must be or why go to the expense of building them) it does not make sense to me to vary greatly from floor to floor the size of this outdoor amenity for the sole purpose of creating visual interest on the exterior
 
If baloneys are a selling point (and they must be or why go to the expensive of building them) it does not make sense to me to vary greatly from floor to floor the size of this outdoor amenity for the sole purpose of creating visual interest on the exterior

In related news, Schneider's takes stake in building development.
 
Putting the project in context... here's 2BW/Cumberland Terrace with the rest of the Bloor-Yorkville skyline in Sketchup.

2936570011_51203d026f_o.jpg


2937422532_3f136f7ee7_o.jpg


2937422170_a19b8bf8c4_o.jpg


2936568835_ef94969bdd_o.jpg


2936568559_1b2589d0d4_o.jpg


2937421248_af50dff55c_o.jpg


2937420956_1b28899758_o.jpg


2937420678_6c6c2ae04a_o.jpg


2936567403_05675d0ac8_o.jpg


2937420020_ce69c0b538_o.jpg


2937419692_e79c940229_o.jpg
 
coodos Wylie ~ (thanks as always)
 
very, very cool. thanks!

amazing to consider that yorkville will have just about the number 2 skyline in canada in a few years...not that i am one for such intercity pissing contests, it's still impressive.
 
The GTA already has a few skylines...downtown, North York, Mississauga, Hamilton, soon Yorkville.
 
Yep a few more developing ones as well! Although they're mainly low rise.

Hamilton is pushing it a bit....
 

Back
Top