M II A II R II K
Senior Member
And that goes for the other lines as well.
I'm exceedingly disappointed that they are dropping through-routing of Eglinton and the SRT.
As Steve Munroe said:
And lower in the comments:
As for whether it will ever be an option in the future?
A big giant question.
Frankly, through routing of both the SRT and the Scarborough-Malvern line with the Eglinton line seems to be incredibly logical, and a relatively simple 3 track station layout would work. However, I'm sure that this would be unacceptable, and they will build a facility that locks in the existing operation.
Diverting traffic currently using the B-D to instead use Eglinton, and a very busy section of the Yonge line is an advantage?This is the major advantage of the Rob Ford proposal (where the SRT and Eglinton would have been interlined and Eglinton fully grade separated, resulting in a huge increase in ridership on Eglinton).
If they are going to start dropping important stations like oakwood and chaplain then they better start chopping a bunch of these useless surface stations as well. Btw blackcreek does not need a station - WESTON does!!
Still rumored to go. Munro has it on his website on a recent post. I think he has a good tip.
Diverting traffic currently using the B-D to instead use Eglinton, and a very busy section of the Yonge line is an advantage?
The Eglinton line isn't intended as a BD-relief line. It would only function as such, because it would have wider stop spacings than Danforth.
If we need to relieve the BD line from Kennedy to Yonge, then use the Stouffville GO service, which runs non-stop from Kennedy to Union in 19 minutes - hopefully faster once it's electrified.
With a fully underground (or otherwise grade-separated) Eglinton concept, there was an expectation that it could help RELIEVE the Yonge line. (All else being equal.)
Right now, ALL transfers between east-west rapid transit and the Yonge line occur at Bloor-Yonge. If that traffic was split into two locations (with SRT users traferring at Eglinton), congestion at Bloor-Yonge would be relieved. This would allow for the dwell time at Bloor to be reduced, with dwell times there being one of the great barriers to increased frequency on Yonge.
Bloor-Eglinton would be busier, but overall crowding would be reduced.
Andrewpnk was saying something along the lines of it was good that Eglinton underground gained so many more passengers. As TTC demonstrated that these passengers were mostly being diverted from the Bloor Danforth line, then it's clear that under the Metrolinx-Ford plan, Eglinton was acting as a Bloor Danforth relief line. Whether Metrolinx called it this or not wasn't my point.Where in any Metrolinx publications do you see that Eglinton "fully underground" was ever meant to be a Bloor Danforth line relief?
As I've said on so many occasions...So I'll repeat. Fare integration would be necessary between TTC and GO.It's been said here on so many occasions...So I'll repeat. TTC riders WILL NOT pay the extra fare to take the GO within their own city. ... They wont use the GO no matter how much you want it...
Andrewpnk was saying something along the lines of it was good that Eglinton underground gained so many more passengers. As TTC demonstrated that these passengers were mostly being diverted from the Bloor Danforth line, then it's clear that under the Metrolinx-Ford plan, Eglinton was acting as a Bloor Danforth relief line. Whether Metrolinx called it this or not wasn't my point.
As I've said on so many occasions...So I'll repeat. Fare integration would be necessary between TTC and GO.
You honestly think GO/TTC fare integration is anywhere on the horizon? I hope you're right, but highly, highly doubt it.




