News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.1K     0 

How long until the line east of Laird is closed and Laird to Don Mills is rebuilt, so that Don Mills and everything west (including the Eglinton West extension) is fully grade separated and east of Don Mills becomes the genesis of the Eglinton East LRT?
I don't know if you'd even have to close the line. The only place where automobile traffic crosses the track is at Leslie.

If you were to grade separate, I'd think the easiest thing to do is to widen the CP span over Eglinton, and keep the eastbound turning lanes for Leslie on the north side of the tracks, between the Laird and Don Valley portals.

If Eglinton line doesnt WOW after finch, say goodbye to further LRT expansions in toronto.
I don't see that precludes grade-separating at Leslie. Do you antipicate slow LRT service between Laird and Pearson?
 
If Eglinton line doesnt WOW after finch, say goodbye to further LRT expansions in toronto.
That would be a good thing. If the City can't gather the fortitude to put transit ahead of cars, then any new LRT would be a colossal waste of money and they sure won't get a nickel from Queen's Park.
 
How long until the line east of Laird is closed and Laird to Don Mills is rebuilt, so that Don Mills and everything west (including the Eglinton West extension) is fully grade separated and east of Don Mills becomes the genesis of the Eglinton East LRT?
In theory if you had a maintenance facility in the East End, and the Ontario Line was open you could have an Eglinton East LRT running from science centre east, which would funnel traffic to and from the Ontario Line.

That will never happen. Noone is going to fund that kind of rebuild.

You would have to rebuild the Laird to Don Mills section as a tunnel. And then, rebuild the Don Mills Stn itself, add 2 more tracks so it can serve as a terminus for both the western and the eastern line.

What would you gain?
- The eastern section doesn't become any faster
- The western section becomes a bit faster, and a bit easier to operate, but the improvements are minor
- The riders yell and scream that they lost the ability to travel across Don Mills without a transfer, basically for no gains that matter to them
- Other transit riders yell and scream that Eglinton is getting the funding twice in a row, while they are getting zilch
- And worst of all, you do not gain a lot of capacity in the western section, that is now fully grade separated. The trains can run a bit more frequently, but then you hit the next capacity bottleneck, which likely to be the size of platforms and the capacity of elevators / stairs. A tansit line designed for 10k to 13k PPHPD, does not turn into a 30k+ transit line, just because you removed one section.
 
Last edited:
Truly. This argument that this project would be a roaring success if only the authorities had listened to reason and wisely chosen to make it significantly more complex and expensive...
Even though the potential to screw up a driverless metro with platform screen doors is lower than a mixed grade LRT with two tunnels, I wouldn't put it past Metrolinx and the TTC to somehow screw that up as well. At least a driverless metro with PSD usually has >99% service reliability.

There is just a higher floor for automated metro than a overly complicated Line 5 with bespoke subsystems. A badly run LRT is much worse than a badly run metro.

"You learn the lesson all commuters must know immediately: when something really matters, you leave early or take an Uber, but you never rely on the TTC. [...]
In most major cities, the transit experience is reversed. Hong Kong’s Mass Transit Railway system (MTR) operates at a 99.9 per cent on-time rate; Dubai reaches 99.7 per cent; New York, even with its aging system, sits at 84 per cent. Vancouver operates around 96 per cent."
Yeah, we’ve never seen slow zones in the subway, schedule bloat, lineups at terminals, operational problems, lines that never get built, etc. Such a transit paradise.
It's disingenuous to compare a brand new LRT with a subway system up to 71 years old , when you should be comparing LRT to modern metro. The TTC's subway service reliability as well as all-mode on-time rate of 57.98% [1] is much lower than the typical >99% for automated metro w/ PSDs. A big part of the never ending slow zones is the lack of funding to upgrade to ballastless track, as is the standard for modern metros. Penny wise pound foolish.
1765689717299.png
1. https://toronto.citynews.ca/2023/07/061/ttc-buses-streetcars-subway-reliability/
 
Last edited:

Back
Top