News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.2K     0 

No, smart meters are not a sure-fire way to get people to conserve, but they can help if one wants to conserve and save money.

Maybe I'm dreaming, but wouldn't it be neat to have cheap electricity and have people use it responsibily, as in not wasting it. Fantasy is such fun.
 
insideTORONTO.com
Mike Adler
03/16/06

Hearn power plant bidder wants fair treatment from province.

Walking in a stiff wind, Bill Leedy keeps looking up at the massive red brick walls of the Richard L. Hearn Thermal Generating Station, searching for cracks.
In places, he acknowledged, the roof leaks and water dribbles through walls of the former coal-fired plant. Still, for a 60-year-old building that has sat idle since the 1980s, it looks solid, suggested Leedy, who for two years has been the Toronto point man for a Baltimore-based firm seeking to resurrect the Hearn with natural gas turbines.

But what chance does Leedy really have, a month after the province approved a rival bid by TransCanada Pipelines to build a new gas-fired plant next door to the Hearn on Unwin Avenue?

"I'm asked this question in Baltimore all the time. I honestly don't know," he said this week.

It won't be easy, but Leedy, executive director of generation plant development for Constellation Energy Generation Group, said he's encouraged by support his bid is getting from the city, the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation and many Riverdale residents.

"Governments change their minds, they alter their decisions," said Leedy, who thinks the Toronto-Danforth provincial byelection on March 30, in which Liberal candidate Ben Chin backs TransCanada's Portlands Energy Centre and New Democrat Peter Tabuns supports Constellation's plan, "will be a referendum on the two projects."

Constellation's partner Toronto Hydro has complained the province treated their bid unfairly and Leedy said he's frustrated by "misinformation" about it, including some comments from Energy Minister Donna Cansfield.

"I think the people of Toronto and the people of Ontario deserve to hear what the truth is. We are disappointed to the extent that inaccurate information has been propagated."

In an interview, Cansfield has said Constellation asked for an environmental assessment on its project to be waived and the Hearn site sold to its consortium for free. And although their bid was presented as cheaper than the PEC, Cansfield said Constellation "indicated they would have to spend $120 million in temporary generation" to make their plan work by 2008, when experts say the city will need more power to avoid blackouts.

"We never have and never will ask that property to be given to us at any price, let alone for nothing," Leedy responded this week, saying Constellation has offered "to step into the shoes" of Hearn lease-holder Studios of America.

The new plant would pay property taxes and rent - $24 million over next 20 years - to the site landlord Ontario Power Generation and spend "upwards of $10 million" restoring the Hearn, he added.

Constellation did ask for an assessment waiver, said Leedy, but wants one no longer. After seeing Cansfield give the PEC "certain financial assurances and cost-recovery mechanisms" that would allow its backers to accelerate approvals and otherwise speed up construction, Constellation only wants to be treated the same way, he said.

As for Cansfield's statement that the Hearn can't be made ready in time, Leedy said that's not accurate. What Cansfield described as $120-million worth of temporary generators is just her estimate on a contingency plan, he said.

And in any case, the Hearn project is coupled with a Toronto Hydro plan to save 200 megawatts by 2008 through conservation programs, which "buys us a year's worth of contingency," Leedy said.

Constellation, however, is still fending off swipes from the ministry about its proposal, which Cansfield has called incomplete.

"They have no designs, there's no environmental approvals, there's no site," added Neal Kelly, senior media advisor to Cansfield, who stuck to his boss's prediction this week.

"There's no question they'll be into temporary generation if they're the candidate selected."

In addition, there are "all kinds of questions about the structural integrity" of the Hearn, which would have to be substantially changed to put Constellation's turbines inside, Kelly said.

He also questioned the type of turbine Constellation is proposing to use, saying they are "not proven technology."

Leedy said Constellation already operates a power plant using those turbines. In a few weeks, the company will release drawings showing how they can be placed inside the Hearn.

Both bids now seem to offering benefits to the community on what is now a forlorn stretch of waterfront near the Leslie Street Spit.

Besides conserving space by putting a plant in the Hearn, Constellation is hoping to restore and rent out the plant's three-storey, 45,000-square-foot office wing. It would fund a $30-million trust, administered by "diverse and competing interests" which could, for instance, help the city build a running path around the Shipping Channel or a brick facade around the Hydro One switching station behind the Hearn.

Though its protected by a heritage designation, Kelly also suggested "something" would happen to the Hearn after the PEC was built.

"The Hearn could disappear, the Hearn could become a cultural centre," he said. "The building can still be used for something, just not a power plant again."

----------------------------------------------------

If PEC is ever built, would it not make sense to tear down The Hearn and make this land available for open space uses and redevelopment.
 
No the Hearn should not be torn down! It's a spectacular, attractive building.

The PEC proposal not only gobbles up the extra land, it leaves the Hearn plant derelict, effectively doubling the new plant's footprint.

I don't get the logic. Why does the Hearn have to remain derelict? It's not power plant or nothing!

I don't think the Hearn, or any other GTA plant will ever burn coal again. No matter how "clean," it's still far too dirty to operate in an urban area. It's conceivable that if, say, John Tory defeats McGuinty in the next election, Nanticoke will continue burning.
 
Constellation Energy, a company with 12,000 megawatts of power-generating capacity in the United States, says that reusing the Hearn plant is no problem.

Statements like this always worry me. For example, will the existing building require retrofitting to meet present construction standards.

No problem? There are always problems.
 
adma:

Except that I don't recall Hearn having much, if any architectural details, unlike the Deco Bankside power station.

No doubt the scale of Hearn is still impressive, but I am not sure if there is anything is worth preserving at the cost of what the site "could be" if redeveloped.

AoD
 
Though note that I said ""spectacular, attractive" potential". That is, deferring judgment on Hearn as it is, as opposed to what it *could* be...

Once again, blame Tate Modern (or the cover of Pink Floyd's "Animals"). It led us to fetishize power stations...
 
Keep in mind that thanks to precedents like the Tate Modern, we're now more conditioned to see the "spectacular, attractive" potential in stuff like Hearn
tate-modern.jpg
 
I'm with unimaginative2. Its an interesting building that can be reused for something else if it can no longer be a power plant.
 
Time to stock up on batteries and candles.


Rita Trichur
Canadian Press
Wednesday, April 05, 2006

TORONTO -- There's an urgent need to fix supply problems in Ontario's electricity market to save Canada's largest city from experiencing power brownouts by 2008, says TransAlta Corp.'s (TSX:TA) top executive.

Stephen Snyder, CEO of the Calgary-based utility company, issued the warning about voltage reductions in Toronto during a speech Wednesday to the Economic Club.

He said Canada's most populous province should move quickly to adopt a more competitive supplier system while scrapping price caps, because it must refurbish or replace about 80 per cent of its generation capacity over the next 15 years.

"I say it is a national issue because Ontario is still Canada's industrial heartland. And good or bad, what happens in Ontario does ripple across this country," Snyder said.

"The challenging supply situation here in the province has been known for years and, in my opinion, is not getting better quickly enough."

He added: "Without out an immediate addition of generation in the GTA (Greater Toronto Area), and without transmission upgrades, Toronto is facing brownouts by 2008 or sooner."

Brownouts are intentional voltage reductions taken to prevent a full power outage or a blackout. Last year, Ontarians were asked to voluntarily cut down on power consumption 12 times to avoid such disruptions.

In February, the Independent Electricity System Operator highlighted the need for new supply, transmission and conservation for the GTA, including 250 megawatts of generation in central Toronto by 2008.

"That's electricity-speak for 'Our equipment is overloaded,"' Snyder said of the report.

However, the IESO has also said Ontario appears to be in better position to meet demand this summer, compared with last year, noting more than 600 megawatts of supply came online in the past eight months.

Its findings followed a December report by the Ontario Power Authority predicting the power system will be overwhelmed by 2013 due to increased demand, lost nuclear power from current stations that aren't refurbished, and the elimination of coal-fired production.

Ontario has committed to closing its remaining coal plants, which generate about a fifth of the province's electricity, by the end of 2009 due to pollution concerns.

The OPA report estimated it would cost up to $70 billion to ensure Ontario has enough electricity to power the province over the next 20 years. It recommends the province construct or replace up to 12,400 megawatts of nuclear power -- requiring 12 or more new nuclear reactor units -- a plan opposed by environmentalists, including scientist David Suzuki.

Energy Minister Donna Cansfield is expected to respond to those recommendations later this month, possibly next week. Her response will coincide with the Ontario Energy Board's announcement on new rates that take effect May 1.

TransAlta is one of Canada's largest independent power companies, with 51 power plants in Canada, the U.S., Mexico and Australia and nearly 9,000 megawatts of electricity generation capacity either in operation, under construction or under development.

It derives about eight per cent of its revenues from Ontario, but has put long-term investment on hold until the province provides certainty about its long-term regulatory plan.

"My sense is that there is not a clearly articulated and agreed-to instinct for the power market in Ontario. Some will tell you that we are headed toward a competitive market, others clearly expect a managed system," Snyder said.

"In the short term, if they are offering long-term contracts backed by the government, then we would certainly be willing to participate."

The utility has previously invested more than $750 million in four Ontario gas-cogeneration plants, including a key facility in Sarnia.
 
The Tate Modern is a great building designed by one of the giants of 20th century architecture, Sir Giles Gilbert Scott (he of phone box fame, based on Soane' tomb, not to mention Trinity College Chapel right here in town). The old Hearn station is nothing in comparison.
 
Note that when I said "It led us to fetishize power stations", I didn't imply it was a particularly discriminating sort of fetishizing. More that "power stations are cool, maaaan".
 
and another left hook..

Courtesy: The Toronto Star
Apr. 6, 2006. 07:02 AM
JOHN SPEARS
CITY HALL BUREAU

Toronto Hydro and its partner say they're still ready and willing to install a series of jet engines inside the mothballed Hearn generating station on Toronto's eastern waterfront to help keep electricity flowing downtown.

But their proposed power plant is still winning only lukewarm backing from local residents.

And Ontario Energy Minister Donna Cansfield — who backs a rival project — insists the Toronto Hydro plant is no longer in the running.

She has directed the Ontario Power Authority to deal directly with Portlands Energy Centre — a partnership between Ontario Power Generation and TransCanada Corp. — to supply downtown Toronto with power. The city risks rolling blackouts by 2008 without a new power supply.

Undaunted, Toronto Hydro and its partner, Baltimore-based Constellation Energy, made a new pitch for their project yesterday at a high-rise restaurant overlooking the waterfront.

The partners argued that their project is better because it will be installed inside the old Hearn plant, unlike the Portlands project that would erect a new industrial building beside the Hearn.

They say their project is cheaper — about $565 million compared with $700 million for Portlands.

While politicians and residents have voiced opposition to the Portlands project, no one seems to endorse the Toronto Hydro-Constellation proposal with enthusiasm.

That didn't change for Rai Tanaka and Glen Markham, two east-end residents who chair a coalition of community groups opposing the Portlands. Both attended yesterday's session.

"I'm not sure we need a plant," Tanaka said.

"But if we're going to build one, if there's general agreement that there is a need for new generation, this plant makes more sense than the other one."

Markham agreed the Portlands plan is wrong — he called it a "double Hearnia" — but couldn't endorse its rival.

"Our issue is: We don't trust anybody," he said.
 
I certainly never suggested that the Hearn is anything like the Bankside power station in terms of appeal (it's not), but that doesn't mean that it doesn't have a number of features well worth preserving. It has massive windows that must bathe the interior in light, it has attractive proportions, and it has what must be one of the largest interior spaces in the city by volume. It’s also an example, unique in Ontario, of a thermal power plant from that period.
 

Back
Top