[Davis]

^^^
It really didn't come together well. Swing and a miss imo ?

 

[TheKingEast]

^^^
It really didn't come together well. Swing and a miss imo ?

More like a strike-out because this should have been an easy slam dunk but they missed the entire court.

 

[mr24]

 

[AlbertC]

 

[Yegger]

i can't forgive them for the terrible treatment of McCaul Street. What's up with the ridiculously low first floor?

 

[karledice]

Good on paper, horrible in real life

 

[condovo]

I don't know...it's kind of growing on me...

 

[AlvinofDiaspar]

I don't know...it's kind of growing on me...

Until you see the details - then it won't grow on you, it will gnaw on you.

AoD

 

[interchange42]

i can't forgive them for the terrible treatment of McCaul Street. What's up with the ridiculously low first floor?

That's my main complaint about this building. Ground floors should not look like you have to duck to enter them. Absolute minimum ground floor heights for such buildings on prominent streets should be 4 metres.

Otherwise, the cladding design is just fine here.

42

 

[Cloverfield]

I don’t find this building ugly.. I think it looks modern and different in my opinion... but than again there is people that don’t even like modern architect or futuristic .. I don’t understand them, and who cares about them Lol.

 

[JosephWu]

Common area finishes are very modern.

 

[ushahid]

that marble is ?

 

[Johnny Au]

that marble is ?

There's an excellent reason why we shouldn't judge condos by their architecture.

 

[TheKingEast]

There's an excellent reason why we shouldn't judge condos by their architecture.

I don't think any of us judged the interior. It was the exterior and I still think it's a fail.

 

[ushahid]

and we are not even judging it by the architecture we are judging it by the quality.