Contra said:
That Aboveground was a weekly stop for me when I went to school there. Would hate to see it go...only hope that is if they put something up here Aboveground would be able to set up shop there (slightly less cluttered space would do them good).
Click to expand...

Agreed, it could at least add some flavor to a rather bland stretch of McCaul, especially if restored. It could even be integrated as a shell that could be creatively reinterpreted within the new form- preservation/facadism isn't the only solution.

Regardless as-of-late, Diamond Schmitt's architecture has ranged from relatively bland (their institutional projects) to horrid (if you consider their residential architecture). (edit: oops, misread- but point still stands) I would rather not trade this building off with whatever they're going to propose- especially this proposal which ruins the effect of the Alsop tabletop.
 
Last edited:
100 MC CAUL ST
Ward 10 - Tor & E.York District​
​
​

Proposed Use ---​
# of Storeys ---​
# of Units ---​
Type​
Number​
Date Submitted​
Status​
Applications:​
Rezoning​
19 137896 STE 10 OZ​
Apr 9, 2019​
Application Received​
 
Interesting. So something like one of these studies then, I'm assuming:

CCC pic.jpg


Study A.JPG
 

Attachments

  • CCC pic.jpg
    CCC pic.jpg
    52.1 KB · Views: 398
  • CCC pic.jpg
    CCC pic.jpg
    52.1 KB · Views: 403
  • Study A.JPG
    Study A.JPG
    75.5 KB · Views: 373
  • Study A.JPG
    Study A.JPG
    75.5 KB · Views: 399
  • Study A.JPG
    Study A.JPG
    75.5 KB · Views: 385
bilked said:
Nice to see that they’ve moved away from the proposed south massing. Lots of challenges here, but the south massing would have been incredibly hard to pull off without compromising one of Toronto’s great public spaces.
Click to expand...

Odd as I thought the last planning rationale was to NOT go ahead with the North Tower for the above reasons.
 
Contra said:
Odd as I thought the last planning rationale was to NOT go ahead with the North Tower for the above reasons.
Click to expand...
It would be surprising turnabout again… but I do hope that is what has happened. Maybe the south massing was crated just to scare the local NIMBYs into quitting their whinging about the proposed north massing? It makes way more sense to build at the north end than to compromise the tabletop and park to the south.

42
 
interchange42 said:
It would be surprising turnabout again… but I do hope that is what has happened. Maybe the south massing was crated just to scare the local NIMBYs into quitting their whinging about the proposed north massing? It makes way more sense to build at the north end than to compromise the tabletop and park to the south.

42
Click to expand...
Agree 100%. This proposal always felt more appropriate and moved the height towards Dundas. Also means we keep Aboveground as is which is a nice keepsake.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top