T3G
Senior Member
And that would be faster and more efficient than having a person right there on the scene that can do just that?Detecting and responding to an altercation.
And that would be faster and more efficient than having a person right there on the scene that can do just that?Detecting and responding to an altercation.
I don't think having armed guards on every corner is an efficient use of resources.And that would be faster and more efficient than having a person right there on the scene that can do just that?
Just my personal experience but an employee was riding with me when a crackhead started yelling at and hitting people. I asked him when we got out who do I report it to so it's actually noted? He gave me a war veteran look and said there's no point.I wasn't talking about armed guards, I was talking about having a TTC employee (i.e. a driver) on board the train who can respond to situations as and when they arise, instead of having driverless trains and expecting the unwashed masses to be trained in emergency procedures should something go wrong, be it something that requires intervention from the emergency services or something that requires evacuation of the train.
Just my personal experience but an employee was riding with me when a crackhead started yelling at and hitting people. I asked him when we got out who do I report it to so it's actually noted? He gave me a war veteran look and said there's no point.
Ridership was at 25% for the subway for a whileNo one cares when it requires money to fix the problem. Just wait till everyone quit riding the TTC, then they would realize and start doing things. Otherwise TTC themselves nor the TPS have the capacity to police the subway network. It's not like acting as a crackhead is a criminal offence. They would have to prove they have the drug, prove they are harassing people and our justice system makes it difficult. Also, who wants to deal with these people all day long? Unless you lock them up, you kick them out and they come back in cause they got nothing to do. They need a program in place to get these people to change and laws that will help them accountable.
I'm sure yesterday's incident made headlines big time but what changes would that bring? If they won't fund safety initiatives, everyone will forget after 2 weeks.
High visible presence will be a deterrence.It's not like acting as a crackhead is a criminal offence.
Okay.Unless you lock them up
Kick them out again. If someone is being a nuisance to other passengers, and I'd go so far as to include people who don't take their backpacks off at rush hour, have their feet on the seat, blast their music out loud, etc, then they can gtfo. Come back when you want to behave.you kick them out and they come back in cause they got nothing to do.
I'll assume most of the people on the forum are men and the perspective of the other 50% of the population is missing.I don't think having armed guards on every corner is an efficient use of resources.
And frankly, most rent-a-cops are useless.
The TTC has lots of people riding the system when they were sitting next to people who had a virus that could kill them via airborne transmission. If you wanted a demonstration of how many people in Toronto have to take their chances even with some personal risk because their circumstances and employment options left no choice, 2020 was a good time to observe it.Just wait till everyone quit riding the TTC, then they would realize and start doing things.
Singapore has this, though it is rare globallyI'd be persuaded if other automated systems demonstrated the need to have staff on board every vehicle.