ksun
Senior Member
Again, where does this idea come from? If you go to Shanghai or Prague or Washington chances are you're going to get around the core of the city by subway, not bus or streetcar, unless the latter goes somewhere the subway doesn't. Toronto didn't keep streetcars for local service on Yonge, Bloor or the Danforth. As I said, the vast majority of riders will choose the subway. As for service problems on the subway, people will do what seems like a foreign concept in Toronto currently: take a parallel subway instead of your usual line. That will actually be possible when the RL is complete.
To repeat, subways are for local service. This notion that they aren't seems to be a weird Toronto phenomenon.
Very true. I don't understand why many Torontonians have this commuting vs. local service difference in their head. Even in hyper dense cities such as inner Shanghai and Tokyo, subway stops are not 400m apart (feel free to check), and bus stops are definitely not 200m apart. As long as it is under 10 minutes, people always choose to walk to the subway station, not the buses. I simply don't understand why so many tend to think if the subway stations require a 5-7 minutes walk, then people would prefer taking the ultra-slow streetcars to save 2-3 minutes of walking. It is simply wrong. I saw the 97 occasionally and every time there are fewer than 5 passengers, so what's the point? Who really takes 97 south of Eglinton Ave? It is completely redundant.
All subways in Shanghai are "local service". What else are they? They are not commuting trains from the suburbs directly to the CBD.
In terms of the 501, honestly, how often do we really take it from the west end all the way to the east end, without getting off between Spadina and Yonge? Maybe 5% of the time?