UtakataNoAnnex
Senior Member
...for what it's worth, breaths a small sigh of relief.
Who says they won't be? There's clearly a caption saying "Transit-Oriented Community proposals not shown" on your linked image.View attachment 515791
It seems like a no brainer to locate density on on top of a subway station in the downtown core (the entire Yonge line south of Rosedale station, for example). Is it clear why these two sites aren't being developed with higher-density buildings on top?
Odd assumption, you need only type “Queen Spadina TOC” into google and you’ll see this is in the works by IO.View attachment 515791
It seems like a no brainer to locate density on on top of a subway station in the downtown core (the entire Yonge line south of Rosedale station, for example). Is it clear why these two sites aren't being developed with higher-density buildings on top?
both stations will have the heritages retained. I think i remember a newsletter saying this. They will be taking it apart and putting it back together again afterwardsI'm not sure I understand why so much of the north building along Spadina was demolished.
Was it an addition and therefore not heritage? Are they rebuilding the facade like at Bathurst?
I think it's a fair assumption to make when the rendering depicts a 1 story building. I came here to find out why it's only going to be 1 story since the Metrolinx community consultation rendering shows that. I'd wager to bet that 9 people out of 10 would assume the building shown is the building being built, at least to the most part.Odd assumption, you need only type “Queen Spadina TOC” into google and you’ll see this is in the works by IO.
Holy smokes, there's a name I haven't seen in awhile! How goes it, @cassius?!I think it's a fair assumption to make when the rendering depicts a 1 story building. I came here to find out why it's only going to be 1 story since the Metrolinx community consultation rendering shows that. I'd wager to bet that 9 people out of 10 would assume the building shown is the building being built, at least to the most part.
Very happy to learn that isn't the case though!
Fair enough, the clue for the other one out of ten people is the subtext that says Transit-Oriented Community proposals not shown.I think it's a fair assumption to make when the rendering depicts a 1 story building. I came here to find out why it's only going to be 1 story since the Metrolinx community consultation rendering shows that. I'd wager to bet that 9 people out of 10 would assume the building shown is the building being built, at least to the most part.
Very happy to learn that isn't the case though!
Ahh yes, I see that in the rendering here. It wasn't present in the render from the Metrolinx newsletter.Fair enough, the clue for the other one out of ten people is the subtext that says Transit-Oriented Community proposals not shown.
A bit older, a bit more jaded, but still here. You should come back more often, it'd be like the good old days! Going back to the first pages in any classic thread is a hell of a throwback for old names...Ahh yes, I see that in the rendering here. It wasn't present in the render from the Metrolinx newsletter.
It's fantastic news. Well, seemingly not news - but to me it is. For the last few days I've been (erroneously) pretty annoyed/distracted by it. Yeah, some strange things keep me up at night. Also, thanks for the elevation schematic!
@ProjectEnd it has been a while! Everything is good, and you? I could be wrong but I think my last forum post was probably ~10 years ago now! Long ago enough that this forum system says "There are no more items to show", other than my post above, about my profile