evandyk said:
I hadn't seen that before, but it's a really nice idea. It's just a short distance to the corner of the new park they're building.
Click to expand...

It's not part the current project - but it's always been on the books (from the 2014 LDL EA Addendum)

1615406207477.png



AoD
 
Hasn't anyone questioned why Waterfront Toronto's concept renderings are so typical? At least Sidewalk's architecture was beautiful, this just looks cookie-cutter. Or is it just a placeholder design?
 
evandyk said:
I hadn't seen that before, but it's a really nice idea. It's just a short distance to the corner of the new park they're building.
Click to expand...
Is that not the cherry street bridge in your reference? The one in the quayside renders seems to be a different bridge entirely. But seeing as it’s not really in the rendering and looks more to be like they just added it in the render for show. I could be completely wrong just how I’m observing this. Project wise ... love the idea, the building they focused on is very theatre park Like?
 
ptbotrmpfn said:
Is that not the cherry street bridge in your reference? The one in the quayside renders seems to be a different bridge entirely. But seeing as it’s not really in the rendering and looks more to be like they just added it in the render for show.
Click to expand...

Yeah, it's clearly not in the document I linked. I hadn't seen it prior to those last few posts in this thread, which is why I asked. I think it would be great if they did, as it would shave a material amount off of the walking time from St. Lawrence or Sugar Beach to the new park.
 
daniel_kryz said:
Hasn't anyone questioned why Waterfront Toronto's concept renderings are so typical? At least Sidewalk's architecture was beautiful, this just looks cookie-cutter. Or is it just a placeholder design?
Click to expand...

That was lingering in the back of my mind as well. Whatever one may think of Sidewalk Labs, the renderings were beautiful.
 
ProjectEnd said:
Because the City isn't trying to distract you from an all-encompassing, surveillance state with flashy renderings?
Click to expand...
Are you saying we should settle for typical design, just because it's not a surveillance state? Am I the only one that was impressed by both the architecture + urbanism of the previous proposal? I'm just saying that the new renderings + block plan are a big downgrade IMO.
 
daniel_kryz said:
Are you saying we should settle for typical design, just because it's not a surveillance state? Am I the only one that was impressed by both the architecture + urbanism of the previous proposal? I'm just saying that the new renderings + block plan are a big downgrade IMO.
Click to expand...
You mean the unbuildable-under-current-code, fantasy land, created purely as a design exercise with about as much realism as a video game? Nah, I'll pass, thanks.
 
daniel_kryz said:
Hasn't anyone questioned why Waterfront Toronto's concept renderings are so typical? At least Sidewalk's architecture was beautiful, this just looks cookie-cutter. Or is it just a placeholder design?
Click to expand...
They are just placeholders. The winning proponent will prepare their own OBC-compliant, non-surveillance designs.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top