smallspy
Senior Member
Oops, I meant post construction.
When a building is built, they do not bring out giant fans to test to see if it can survive 100 km/hr winds, nor is occupancy delayed until a hurricane (or tropical depression) comes to prove it can withstand the design forces. I don't see all the snow gathered up from hockey arenas to confirm that buildings can withstand snow loads. A bridge does not have test trucks drive over it before it is opened to the public.
Of course not. That's what FEA testing is for. And if you think that any residential or commercial building doesn't have its internal systems - elevators, HVAC, security, fire suppression, etc. - tested for a good period of time prior to opening, well, I may have some land in Florida for you to buy....
And that is the problem. They can figure out how the structure of a building will react in all sorts of situations. But it is much, much harder to figure out how various discrete systems come together and interface with each other.
Any other piece of infrastructure that had 9 months of testing would not be accepted by the pubilc. Since this is underground, the public would not know. If a highway sat empty for 9 months of testing I am sure it would be viewed as a boondogle.
Don't be so naive. A highway doesn't need to sit empty for 9 months, because it doesn't have nearly as many systems built into it as something as complex as an office building. But it does need to be tested prior to being opened. You think that they completed the 410 extension on Thursday and opened it on the Friday? Of course not.
Does median LRT (i.e. Sheppard) need similar testing?
It will, but nothing nearly so comprehensive. To use St. Clair as an example - because it is a pretty good one in this case - the work was virtually complete a couple of weeks prior to opening.
Dan
Toronto, Ont.