Seems we have two major mind sets here. One is all for "the taller the better", while others prefer a more cautious, economically viable option, with height considerations secondary. I won't lie, I'm all for taller (hopefully supertall one day), yet at the same time, reality seeps in, not all proposals (very few actually) go as planned. To use the worst cliche I can find, can't we all just get along? The more I read here, the more I realize the complexities involved in putting up a tower, it gives us plenty of fodder for discussion, but in this particular case, I'm willing to bet 68 will not be the top out floor count. As for heritage buildings, if you have any sense of historical pride, you have to allow these building to be completely restored, not just leaving their facade. There is plenty of room in our core to allow both to exist. They are a vital part of our cities history, particularly, of architectural history, something I'd expect a site dedicate to just that would appreciate, but that's just my insane views on things, to each his (or hers) own!