Ramako
Moderator
Last I heard they were close to securing an anchor, but that was about a year ago. Who knows what's happened since?
How fitting that the SPA application came in this week. Still awaiting docs:They've screwed themselves on this. There are no anchor tenants, maybe except RBC, who need a new office and could pay for this. They arent going to kick this off without at least a 40% lease ...
This is going to start looking rather stubby with such a large floorplate...reduced to 57s now
still..274 meters in height plus spiralsreduced to 57s now
How does a change from 60 storeys to 57 suddenly make the building look stubby?This is going to start looking rather stubby with such a large floorplate...
Office isn't res. Doesn't work like that.y dont they reduce the size of floorplate and increase the number of floors.
It was already looking quite stubby at 60. Chopping off 3 stories for an office building ends up being over 10m which is noticeable, imo. A single set-back as it rises would really improve that, especially as from ground level it would exaggerate the height by creating a more intense vanishing point towards the spire. Granted, I know with the external framing in the design, a set-back wouldn't look great.How does a change from 60 storeys to 57 suddenly make the building look stubby?
Comparison of the two isn't as bad as I thought but still a large difference from the initial proposal (such is life).
View attachment 220555
not slightly, alot shorter. its not 300m anymore. seems like the lighting rods have been reduced in length too.