Update:

Soooo, the Minor Variance request did not advance through the system as the applicant might have hoped:

1709888059316.png

This has resulted in a resubmission...........when denied 35s via SPA, appeal to the OLT, when denied 40s, via Minor Variance, while the SPA is under appeal, resubmit for 50s!

🤣

Chutzphah has rarely been better defined.

1709888328796.png

As long as we're going to reopen the can of worms...............lets nix that fake park that's less than 5M wide (or 1/3 less wide than my apartment) LOL. Come on now, if everything's back on the table, I want an offsite acquisition, at a more than 40% height increase from the original proposal, I also want parkland worth 40% more, plus inflation adjustment. Just saying....

New AIC Link:


Ahead of the renders, @Paclo is flagged.

Also PE will be happy to know:

3 cabs for 330 units. Pretty good. It's an abnormally small plate so I doubt an extra shaft would even be possible. Even better that they're taking 25 spaces out here, it's literally 50m from St. Clair station.

There are now 4 cabs in the plan.

Renders:

1709888869443.png


1709888907283.png


1709888934788.png


1709888961434.png


1709888993410.png


1709889025037.png


1709889061279.png



1709889103022.png
 
Update:

Soooo, the Minor Variance request did not advance through the system as the applicant might have hoped:

View attachment 546688
This has resulted in a resubmission...........when denied 35s via SPA, appeal to the OLT, when denied 40s, via Minor Variance, while the SPA is under appeal, resubmit for 50s!

🤣

Chutzphah has rarely been better defined.

View attachment 546689
As long as we're going to reopen the can of worms...............lets nix that fake park that's less than 5M wide (or 1/3 less wide than my apartment) LOL. Come on now, if everything's back on the table, I want an offsite acquisition, at a more than 40% height increase from the original proposal, I also want parkland worth 40% more, plus inflation adjustment. Just saying....

New AIC Link:


Ahead of the renders, @Paclo is flagged.

Also PE will be happy to know:



There are now 4 cabs in the plan.


Renders:
Wow. 4 cabs for 409 units, even on a very tight 614sm plate. Good to see some folks taking this seriously!
 
Is the strategy here to ask for 50 and accept being bumped down to 40, like they already wanted?

Seems way too small a site to support such a large building, in footprint, space for residents, and respect for neighbourhood.

Has there ever been a similar site go from 7 stories to 50 stories? With all of the flipping, maybe only a 50-story tall tower will be profitable?

Is that little strip of grass supposed to be green space?. Might be big enough for a dog washroom...
 

Well this data serves a great narrative why density at Yonge & St. Clair is appropriate...
 
Is the strategy here to ask for 50 and accept being bumped down to 40, like they already wanted?

Seems way too small a site to support such a large building, in footprint, space for residents, and respect for neighbourhood.

Has there ever been a similar site go from 7 stories to 50 stories? With all of the flipping, maybe only a 50-story tall tower will be profitable?

Is that little strip of grass supposed to be green space?. Might be big enough for a dog washroom...
1365 Yonge was 3 to 50 in a similar period of time.
 

Back
Top