APTA-2048 said:
I have a feeling it’s more of a problem that they don’t care. This building was pretty much tag free while it was operating. I think it’s getting demolished, so the City doesn’t care.
Click to expand...

The graffiti by-law does not have an exception for buildings that are vacant, so far as I can recall.

If the City wants it torn down, then great, let them get to it! Until then, they need to keep it up.
 
Northern Light said:
The graffiti by-law does not have an exception for buildings that are vacant, so far as I can recall.

If the City wants it torn down, then great, let them get to it! Until then, they need to keep it up.
Click to expand...
I don't think taxpayers would want their money spent to keep something clean of tags only it for it to be all back there in a month or so. You know, better things to spend on and all that... 😼
 
UtakataNoAnnex said:
I don't think taxpayers would want their money spent to keep something clean of tags only it for it to be all back there in a month or so. You know, better things to spend on and all that... 😼
Click to expand...

I agree, which is why they should expedite demolition.
 
Last edited:
Some more slides at from a presentation at today's CreateTO Board meeting, covering the process so far - and next steps...

1730250675066.png


PDF - https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ra/bgrd/backgroundfile-249810.pdf

1730250692928.png

1730250720944.png


1730250742933.png


1730250759597.png



1730250772148.png

Successful Proponent will be announced shortly after City Council approves the deal in mid-November.
 
Tuscani01 said:
Looks like it may be around 50 metres. As @Northern Light pointed out, it likely just means moving around the massing. It’s a big enough site to play around with.
Click to expand...

If the maximum height is 50 metres, is the site even economically viable for development? Are we looking at an annual Spirit Halloween shop?
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top