Yesterday:
DSC00078.JPG
DSC00076.JPG
 

Attachments

  • DSC00078.JPG
    DSC00078.JPG
    261.3 KB · Views: 1,428
  • DSC00076.JPG
    DSC00076.JPG
    293.6 KB · Views: 1,355
Solar array on the roof, as seen from the top of the McLennan Physical Labs:

DSC07692.jpg

DSC07490.jpg


42
 

Attachments

  • DSC07490.jpg
    DSC07490.jpg
    364 KB · Views: 1,229
  • DSC07692.jpg
    DSC07692.jpg
    505 KB · Views: 1,238
i guess limited funding on this building.. so poorly done..
Really? In what ways? When I was past here two weeks ago I was struck at how tasteful it is. The columns, in my view, are extremely tasteful--they add solidity and continuity to the building without being mundane, because the pattern subtly breaks 1/3 up. The brickwork/colour is very subtle and soft. And if you look carefully, this building 'talks to' the 1960s/70s engineering building just one address south.

I thought this was really tastefully done, in other words.
 
Really? In what ways? When I was past here two weeks ago I was struck at how tasteful it is. The columns, in my view, are extremely tasteful--they add solidity and continuity to the building without being mundane, because the pattern subtly breaks 1/3 up. The brickwork/colour is very subtle and soft. And if you look carefully, this building 'talks to' the 1960s/70s engineering building just one address south.

I thought this was really tastefully done, in other words.

Same -- I'm actually pleasantly surprised by it, and there's some nice, subtle detailing when you walk around it up-close. Really the only things I dislike about it are the horribly cheap-looking panels covering the mech and the fact that it doesn't fit particularly well when you're in the quad.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1604 - Copy.jpg
    IMG_1604 - Copy.jpg
    337.3 KB · Views: 1,317
  • IMG_1686 - Copy.JPG
    IMG_1686 - Copy.JPG
    664.5 KB · Views: 1,218
The St. George side of the building is well done and the architecture is congruent with the context. If you're familiar with U of T Engineering buildings you will know how well this fits in. It's the Front Campus side that's a bit jarring and insensitive. Kind of like us Engineers come to think of it ;) (Alumni but not practicing myself)
 
The interiors are very nice (especially the atrium), but I definitely think a darker, more textured exterior cladding material would have been better.

Until the building gets a bit of grime on it, it'll feel 60s-institutional (perhaps its boxy, contextless form has to do with it as well).
 
Found this building to be surprisingly unlocked the other night (including many of the interior spaces...). Couldn't resist a self-tour!

Overall the interior seems to be really well done. Great attention to detail and the atrium staircases and skylights are quite eye catching. The terrace also provides some killer views.

They've crammed quite a lot of study space into this building which I'm sure will be heavily utilized. It'll be interesting to see how the space functions now that students are starting to move in.

IMG_20180830_225348.jpg
IMG_20180830_221606.jpg
IMG_20180830_222256.jpg
IMG_20180830_223929.jpg
IMG_20180830_223813.jpg
IMG_20180830_222229.jpg
IMG_20180830_222156.jpg
IMG_20180830_222205.jpg
IMG_20180830_222219.jpg
IMG_20180830_222035.jpg
IMG_20180830_223426.jpg
IMG_20180830_222742.jpg
IMG_20180830_222800.jpg
IMG_20180830_222550.jpg

IMG_20180830_221217.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20180830_225348.jpg
    IMG_20180830_225348.jpg
    167.7 KB · Views: 1,169
  • IMG_20180830_223929.jpg
    IMG_20180830_223929.jpg
    121.1 KB · Views: 1,149
  • IMG_20180830_223813.jpg
    IMG_20180830_223813.jpg
    170.2 KB · Views: 1,131
  • IMG_20180830_223426.jpg
    IMG_20180830_223426.jpg
    166.1 KB · Views: 1,148
  • IMG_20180830_222800.jpg
    IMG_20180830_222800.jpg
    156.7 KB · Views: 1,168
  • IMG_20180830_222742.jpg
    IMG_20180830_222742.jpg
    177.3 KB · Views: 1,142
  • IMG_20180830_222550.jpg
    IMG_20180830_222550.jpg
    184.1 KB · Views: 1,095
  • IMG_20180830_222256.jpg
    IMG_20180830_222256.jpg
    168.4 KB · Views: 1,152
  • IMG_20180830_222229.jpg
    IMG_20180830_222229.jpg
    158.6 KB · Views: 1,111
  • IMG_20180830_222219.jpg
    IMG_20180830_222219.jpg
    146.2 KB · Views: 1,111
  • IMG_20180830_222205.jpg
    IMG_20180830_222205.jpg
    150.3 KB · Views: 1,105
  • IMG_20180830_222156.jpg
    IMG_20180830_222156.jpg
    144.6 KB · Views: 1,142
  • IMG_20180830_222035.jpg
    IMG_20180830_222035.jpg
    126.5 KB · Views: 1,078
  • IMG_20180830_221606.jpg
    IMG_20180830_221606.jpg
    178.6 KB · Views: 1,181
  • IMG_20180830_221217.jpg
    IMG_20180830_221217.jpg
    218.2 KB · Views: 1,105
Outside reminds me of melamine. Love it, and the interior concrete. The wood details are nice. And lighting seems to have been well considered. Solid.

Oh, and the giant waffle slab ceiling? Swoon.
 

Back
Top