News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 6.7K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 34K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 3.4K     0 

Streety McCarface

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
2,124
Reaction score
2,222
It would be interesting to see ridership by station, and how that had changed.

Oakville GO for example appears very empty still of car commuters. The south lot is closed. The main lot maybe 25% full on a weekday. Same with the garage. The lot east of Trafalgar was closed all winter, not sure if it has reopened.
Ridership from Kitchener has got to be at an all-time high, daily usage of the station is probably close to 1000 boardings and 1000 alighting's when it's not a student migration day. For those, see:
It will take longer for a commuter system like GO to recover its ridership and this is similar to what has happened in nearly every other city with their commuter rail systems.

Commuter rail is very much focused on getting people from the suburban homes to downtown offices. White collar work is, by far, the biggest candidate for working from home and hence a huge number of those trips are no longer needed. As GO slowly turns into a more suburban & rapid transit system, the percentage of riders strictly going from their suburban homes to Union will decrease as a proportion of trips provided. GO's recent complete fare integration/reduction and free 905 transfer will greatly expediate this process.
Ironically, in some US cities, regional rail ridership recovery is actually exceeding that of local service recovery (ie bus and subway). NYC has been dealing with this. https://new.mta.info/coronavirus/ridership

In other news: GRT's ridership now exceeds that of pre pandemic ridership.
 

nfitz

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Nov 10, 2007
Messages
25,562
Reaction score
6,456
City:
Toronto
Ironically, in some US cities, regional rail ridership recovery is actually exceeding that of local service recovery (ie bus and subway). NYC has been dealing with this. https://new.mta.info/coronavirus/ridership
Interesting - similar to GO, it's only on weekends (and only on Metro North). I'd assumed GO was somewhat driven by the much cheaper weekend fares. I wonder what other factors are helping Metro North and not the LIRR.
 

Streety McCarface

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
2,124
Reaction score
2,222
Interesting - similar to GO, it's only on weekends (and only on Metro North). I'd assumed GO was somewhat driven by the much cheaper weekend fares. I wonder what other factors are helping Metro North and not the LIRR.
It seems to also be during weekdays. Their commuter lines are looking at ridership closer to 65-75% pre pandemic ridership, meanwhile the subways are stuck at 60%. My guess is more stringent office work requirements. Of course, we don't have day by day comparisons so it's hard to cross check.
 

W. K. Lis

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 24, 2007
Messages
23,203
Reaction score
13,665
City:
Toronto
It seems to also be during weekdays. Their commuter lines are looking at ridership closer to 65-75% pre pandemic ridership, meanwhile the subways are stuck at 60%. My guess is more stringent office work requirements. Of course, we don't have day by day comparisons so it's hard to cross check.
Likely people "discovered" that a GO train could take them downtown and back faster.
 

nfitz

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Nov 10, 2007
Messages
25,562
Reaction score
6,456
City:
Toronto
It seems to also be during weekdays. Their commuter lines are looking at ridership closer to 65-75% pre pandemic ridership, meanwhile the subways are stuck at 60%. My guess is more stringent office work requirements. Of course, we don't have day by day comparisons so it's hard to cross check.
Ah, I see - I was thinking "exceeding pre-Covid" rather than "exceeding the recovery of bus and subway pre-Covid".

Perhaps the difference is more related to how difficult it is to get through the bridges and tunnels - which have already fully recovered. So any additional recovery is pushed to rail rather than driving.

It will be interesting to see where trends go in the next decade.
 

Streety McCarface

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
2,124
Reaction score
2,222
Ah, I see - I was thinking "exceeding pre-Covid" rather than "exceeding the recovery of bus and subway pre-Covid".

Perhaps the difference is more related to how difficult it is to get through the bridges and tunnels - which have already fully recovered. So any additional recovery is pushed to rail rather than driving.

It will be interesting to see where trends go in the next decade.
People just like driving, and if anything this kind of shows that people will drive unless transit is faster. Once the roads are clogged people will take transit.
 

allengeorge

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jun 27, 2019
Messages
1,533
Reaction score
3,696
Interesting - similar to GO, it's only on weekends (and only on Metro North). I'd assumed GO was somewhat driven by the much cheaper weekend fares. I wonder what other factors are helping Metro North and not the LIRR.
Anecdotally, Long Island is more car-oriented than the towns along the Hudson. Also, given that you’ve to transit all of Brooklyn/Queens to get into Manhattan, maybe there’s just less incentive to travel to the city? Pure speculation.

Personal opinion: I always preferred going into the Hudson towns - either by car or train - because it was far, far less hassle than Long Island.
It seems to also be during weekdays. Their commuter lines are looking at ridership closer to 65-75% pre pandemic ridership, meanwhile the subways are stuck at 60%. My guess is more stringent office work requirements. Of course, we don't have day by day comparisons so it's hard to cross check.
Anecdotally (again!), companies are starting to have more parameters around remote work. Implementation varies by company and industry and some implementations just suck. I think we’re just starting figure out a new normal.
 

nfitz

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Nov 10, 2007
Messages
25,562
Reaction score
6,456
City:
Toronto

Interesting. I bet Pearson recovery would be near 100% if they were at 15 minutes a day, compared to 30 minutes a day.

1676072398682.png


1676072439158.png
 

Top