|
|
|
This is how Alstom is building 33 m cars for Sydney that will run in pairs 67 m long. Wonder how Thunder Bay doing our cars.
Has 4441 shown up??
I thought the schedule was the shipping schedule, not the arrival schedule. Still missed by a couple of days.I saw on twitter someone mention 4442 was at the bay door at the plant in Thunder Bay. So it looks like, depending on when 4442 arrives, they missed the July commitment by about a week.
I thought the schedule was the shipping schedule, not the arrival schedule. Still missed by a couple of days.
But why? If it was just held up testing that identified an issue, probably not serious, assuming the entire assembly line isn't backlogged.
Maybe they held them back to fix the issue with the doors that they have been having. It's also possible that some of the parts for them could have come in later then originally scheduled.I thought the schedule was the shipping schedule, not the arrival schedule. Still missed by a couple of days.
But why? If it was just held up testing that identified an issue, probably not serious, assuming the entire assembly line isn't backlogged.
My understanding the cars are to be on TTC property to be class as ship.I thought the schedule was the shipping schedule, not the arrival schedule. Still missed by a couple of days.
But why? If it was just held up testing that identified an issue, probably not serious, assuming the entire assembly line isn't backlogged.
I wonder if they would consider abandoning shipping by train like they have and instead ship by truck instead as they don't have to wait on CP sending out an engine to pick it up and then have to wait for them to put it on a train heading to Toronto, etc.
I can't imagine how maybe having the LRV's a few days sooner would be worth the hassle and expense of shipping another hundred and fifty of something that big by road all the way from Thunder Bay.
Very costly per car to do what you suggested.I wonder if they would consider abandoning shipping by train like they have and instead ship by truck instead as they don't have to wait on CP sending out an engine to pick it up and then have to wait for them to put it on a train heading to Toronto, etc.
Can you explain why it would be worthwhile to get a new streetcar here a day or two sooner and at a large extra cost? Though CP may not always pick up cargo immediately I doubt truckers would be any better - it's not as though a new streetcar would fit on any truck.I wonder if they would consider abandoning shipping by train like they have and instead ship by truck instead as they don't have to wait on CP sending out an engine to pick it up and then have to wait for them to put it on a train heading to Toronto, etc.
Don't know Thunder Bay Setup, but I would say you need a crane to load the car onto the trailer. You can only travel in daylight with escorts front and rear and deal with height clearance. Once you get into Toronto, will be subject to time window. Will need a crane at Hillcrest or Leslie.
If you are shipping by trucks, cranes are needed and why I said it was a waste doing and ship by rail using ramps. Unless you got a long lowboy that I don't know of that can drop its rear to roll the car off the trailer onto the track with a small ramp, you need a crane. All the cars for Kansas City, Cinci and Detroit were ship on a lowboy that could drop its end and roll off the track since they were only 66' long. If you do what KC did, don't need a crane, but need space for it to be storeYou don't need a crane at either end. It would cost them more than the rail moves do today. There is a TTC gauge'd loading ramp at Thunder Bay already, and it wouldn't take long (or cost much) to build a ramp like the one used in Kitchener for unloading at this end.
Dan
Toronto, Ont.